PDX: Change is not War March this Saturday

   

    Change ≠ War
    Saturday, April 4th

    11:00 am Teach-in: Ending Occupation from Iraq to Afghanistan to Palestine

    Cramer Hall, Portland State University

    2:00 pm March: Out of Iraq, Out of Afghanistan
    Money for People, Not for War
    South Park Blocks, SW Park & SW Salmon

    3:00 pm Public Reading: Dr. Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam" ... 42 years later, an inspiration for today's peace movement.

    Skidmore Fountain, SW 1st & SW Ankeny
 

 

Read more: PDX: Change is not War March this Saturday

Israeli FM questioned over fraud

Israeli FM questioned over fraud

Israel's new Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has been questioned by police for at least seven hours over corruption allegations.

Police said Mr Lieberman was questioned under caution on suspicion of "bribery, money-laundering and breach of trust" as part of an ongoing investigation.

Mr Lieberman was sworn in as foreign minister on Tuesday.

He has previously denied any wrong-doing and says the corruption probe against him is politically motivated.

Mr Lieberman, an ultra-nationalist, is one of Israel's most outspoken politicians.

He was a controversial choice for the leading ministerial post in the government of right-winger Benjamin Netanyahu, which was sworn in on Tuesday.

 

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/7979666.stm

Published: 2009/04/02 15:15:44 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Avigdor Lieberman rules out 'concessions' to Palestinians

Israel never ratified 2007 Annapolis Middle East peace talks, new foreign minister says in debut speech

Israel's new foreign minister dismayed the international community today with a rancorous analysis of the peace process and an announcement that the new government favours aggression rather than concessions to the Palestinians.

In his first speech since taking office, the rightwinger Avigdor Lieberman dismissed the last round of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, arguing that Israeli concessions made in a bid to secure peace had all been fruitless.

"Those who want peace should prepare for war and be strong," he said. "There is no country that made concessions like Israel. Since 1967 we gave up territory that is three times the size of Israel. We showed willingness. The Oslo process started back in 1993, and to this day I have not seen that we reached peace."

Speaking to what the Associated Press describes as a roomful of "cringing diplomats", the new foreign minister said Israel was not bound by the Annapolis peace talks. These were initiated in November 2007 to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and involved around 40 countries.

"The Israeli government never ratified Annapolis; nor did [the] Knesset," said Lieberman, promising to honour only the US-initiated "road map" of 2002, which has long been in stalemate amid accusations from both sides.

Lieberman's speech is in stark contrast to remarks made by the incoming prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, who both said the new government would pursue peace on every front.

During a recent visit to the Czech Republic, the Israeli president said the new administration had promised: "We shall continue the negotiations with the Palestinians. We shall negotiate with each of our neighbours ... and see what can be done in terms of peace on the regional level." And a week before taking office, Netanyahu vowed to engage in peace negotiations with the Palestinian Authority.

Their comments came in reaction to growing international concern that the new Israeli government would not be committed to a two-state peace process.

In today's speech, Lieberman was more amiable towards Egypt, which he described as an "important element in the Arab world". This is an improvement on a few weeks ago, when he said the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, could "go to hell".

The United States Promotes Israeli Genocide Against the Palestinians

As long ago as October 19, 2000, the then United Nations Human Rights Commission (now Council) condemned Israel for inflicting "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" upon the Palestinian people, most of whom are Muslims. The reader has a general idea of what a war crime is, so I am not going to elaborate upon that term here.  But there are different degrees of heinousness for war crimes.  In particular are the more serious war crimes denominated "grave breaches" of the Fourth Geneva Convention.  Since the outbreak of the first Intifada in 1987, the world has seen those heinous war crimes inflicted every day by Israel against the Palestinian people living in occupied Palestine: e.g., willful killing of Palestinian civilians by the Israeli army and by Israel's illegal paramilitary settlers.  These Israeli "grave breaches" of the Fourth Geneva Convention mandate universal prosecution for the perpetrators and their commanders, whether military or civilian, including and especially Israel's political leaders.

But I want to focus for a moment on Israel's "crimes against humanity" against the Palestinian people-as determined by the U.N. Human Rights Commission itself, set up pursuant to the requirements of the United Nations Charter.  What are "crimes against humanity"?  This concept goes all the way back to the Nuremberg Charter of 1945 for the trial of the major Nazi war criminals in Europe.  In the Nuremberg Charter of 1945, drafted by the United States Government, there was created and inserted a new type of international crime specifically intended to deal with the Nazi persecution of the Jewish people:

Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Read more: The United States Promotes Israeli Genocide Against the Palestinians

Israel approves Netanyahu cabinet


Israel's parliament has approved Benjamin Netanyahu's right-leaning coalition cabinet by 69 votes to 45, after a six-hour debate.

Earlier, Mr Netanyahu had asked the country's parliament to trust in him, as it prepared to swear him into office as prime minister.

Mr Netanyahu said these were "not normal times" for Israel as it faced economic and security challenges.

He also said he was ready to hold peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

His coalition cabinet, the result of weeks of tortuous negotiation, is the largest in Israeli political history - the government's meeting table has had to be extended to accommodate all the members.

The cabinet combines Israel's centre-right, centre-left and far-right parties.

Analysts say Iran's nuclear programme is likely to top its security agenda.

Hard-liner Avigdor Lieberman has also been confirmed as foreign minister and Labour veteran Ehud Barak as minister of defence.

Western states have voiced concern at the coalition's likely stance on a two-state solution with the Palestinians.

I say to the Palestinian leadership, if you truly want peace, peace can be obtained
Benjamin Netanyahu

Speaking in the Knesset before being sworn in, Mr Netanyahu said these were "not normal times" for Israel but asked the parliament to trust him "at this time of global crisis, the likes of which we have not had in years".

"Israel finds itself facing two enormous challenges: an economic challenge, and a security challenge. These two crises have come at a time of great international change," he said.

In an apparent reference to Israel's neighbour, Iran, Mr Netanyahu said the biggest threat to Israel and the world "comes from the possibility of a radical regime armed with nuclear weapons".

He said it was "shameful" that "calls by Iranian leaders to destroy Israel are greeted with indifference by the world, without being firmly condemned".

'Not encouraging'

Mr Netanyahu also said he would engage in peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

He told the Palestinian leadership: "If you truly want peace, peace can be obtained.

"We do not want to govern another people. We do not want to exercise our power over the Palestinians."

But a spokesman for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas told the AFP news agency that Mr Netanyahu's statement was "not encouraging", as it made no reference to the possibility of a future Palestinian state.

Mr Netanyahu has said in the past that he sees no need for the Palestinians to have full separate statehood.

This will be Mr Netanyahu's second time as prime minister - he last held the office in 1999.

The BBC's Paul Wood says that when he occupied the post before, Mr Netanyahu talked tough but signed some important agreements with the Palestinians, including handing over land in the West Bank.

But the inclusion of Labour in the coalition will help the government to appear more moderate and to resist pressure, especially from Washington, to move towards a two-state solution, our correspondent says.

Paul Wood reports from Jerusalem The difficulties of coalition building in Israel mean this is a big, big government, with some 30 ministers.

The last time Mr Netanyahu was PM, he failed to complete his term - most Israeli governments don't and this one, an unwieldy and unhappy amalgam of opposites, stands less chance of success than most.

First order of business will be to deal with the economic crisis. That's hit Israel just like everywhere else, although, additionally, there may be signs that the Shekel is seriously over-valued.

This new administration doesn't believe that a negotiated Middle East peace settlement is possible with the Palestinians. They will try instead to contain the conflict while pushing forward Mr Netanyahu's plan for an "economic peace", which involves granting the Palestinians something less than a state.

The main issue as far as Mr Netanyahu is concerned is Iran's supposed nuclear ambitions. Whether or not to bomb Iran will be the new prime minister's most momentous decision - and one he may make quite soon.

Gaza strike

Earlier on Tuesday, Gazan medical sources said two Palestinians were killed in an Israeli air strike in the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli military said the men had been carrying weapons and were trying to plant an explosive device near the border fence.

One Israeli soldier was lightly injured in an exchange of fire when ground troops crossed the fence shortly after the air strike.

Also on Tuesday, Israeli police said two rockets had been fired into Israel by Palestinian militants in Gaza. No injuries or damage were reported.

Tensions over Gaza, with no agreed ceasefire in place in the wake of Israel's bloody operation in January, are one of the pressing security issues the new government will face.

Mr Netanyahu wants to topple Hamas, the militant group that runs the coastal enclave, so the new government could well lead to more difficult times in Gaza, says our correspondent.

Other issues include concerns over Iran's nuclear programme, and whether to pursue a peace deal with Syria.

'Confetti cabinet'

The formation of the government ends nine months of uncertainty since outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced plans to step down in the face of multiple corruption investigations.

In his final speech as prime minister, Mr Olmert said he was proud of his government's many achievements and "not in the least bit resentful" as he left office, reported Israel's Haaretz newspaper.

Mr Olmert also said he was sorry for his government's mistakes, which he said were were "not few", but that his conscience was clear.

"I acted for the nation and the people by the best of my judgment," he said.

Mr Olmert's Kadima party, which backs a two-state solution and is now led by outgoing Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, won the most seats in February elections.

But right-leaning parties did better overall, so her rival, Mr Netanyahu, was considered more likely to be able to form a coalition and invited by President Shimon Peres to try.

Talks aimed at bringing Kadima into a unity government failed, with Ms Livni saying the parties' platforms were too different.

Sitting in opposition will be new territory for the party, our correspondents note, and Israeli commentators are divided as to whether the party will profit from its distinctiveness or simply implode.

 

 

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/7973435.stm

Published: 2009/03/31 21:42:29 GMT

© BBC MMIX
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.