Human Rights Violations in Israel and Palestine: The Association for Civil Rights in Israel Report
- Details
- Written by Stephen Lendman Stephen Lendman
- Published: 03 April 2008 03 April 2008
- Hits: 4772 4772
ACRI is
ACRI
evaluates the state of human rights annually, and it's latest report
coincided with the December 10, 2007 International Human Rights Day.
Its purpose is to cite flagrant violations; note positive trends and
developments, if any; and "trace significant human rights-related
processes (affecting) Israeli citizens and residents." Reports rely on
various information sources: government publications, NGO reports,
newspaper and other published materials, parliamentary documents and
court litigation.
Human
rights violations directly result from government policies, actions and
inactions, and ACRI's report is gloomy. It found the Israeli government
derelict for having allowed the "blanket" of rights it's supposed to
ensure for Arabs and Jews to erode. As a result, rights violations
grow, more people are affected, and those harmed most are on society's
fringes. ACRI's report is comprehensive and documents them in areas of:
-- health;
-- workers' rights;
-- the state of Arab Israelis;
-- education in Sderot;
-- migrant worker rights;
-- citizenship and residency status;
--
human rights in occupied Palestine, highlighting neglect and
discrimination in Arab East Jerusalem, Hebron, and the "unrecognized"
Negev Bedouins;
-- freedom of expression;
-- the right to privacy;
-- criminal justice; and
-- the overall destabilization and erosion of democracy in the country.
ACRI's
evidence is disturbing and compelling, yet it's appalled by the Israeli
public's indifference. It aims to change this by publicizing its
findings so those in government, the media and general population know
them and will react to reverse an ugly and damaging trend. Growing numbers of people worldwide know how
Health Care in
ACRI finds it disturbing. The trend undermines
In
recent years, budgets have been cut, and the trend continued in 2007.
The Ministry of Health's per capita allocation is 14% lower than in
2001, and the Ministry's development budget is 43% lower. Public
hospitals have been hardest hit, patient access to quality health care
has eroded, and medical personnel are understaffed and aren't able to
provide the best care possible.
The Israel Medical Association January 2007 data highlight the crisis:
--
the hospital beds/population ratio has declined; it was 3.27 per 1000
persons in 1970; a year ago it touched 1.94, the lowest figure among
western countries;
--
the approved number of beds hasn't increased, the need for them has,
and it's been met by adding "non-approved" beds that comprise up to 30%
of the total in hospital internal medicine units (IMUs); the result is
growing overcrowding and medical staff unable to cope;
--
on routine days, average hospital occupancy is 100% compared to 85% in
the West; in IMUs it reached 130% and in pediatric units 112%; and
--
overcrowding and underfunding force early patient releases before
they're ready to go; they also contribute to the spread of infections,
viruses and diseases and require doctors and medical staff to be
responsible for a growing number of patients, more than they can
adequately handle.
Ever since the 1994 National Health Insurance Law passed, health services have eroded in violation of its guarantee. The
Most
disadvantaged Israelis lack supplemental insurance: one-third are age
65 or older; 53% are Israeli Arabs; 42% are Jews of Russian origin;
while 11% are from the Hebrew-speaking community. A 2007 Physicians for
Human Rights report describes how various population groups are
disadvantaged. Those furthest removed from
Income
alone is a hugely limiting factor, and two studies document it. A 2005
Brookdale Institute one showed that 15% of Israelis forego some
medications. Among low wage earners, the figure was 23%. A 2006 Israel
Medical Association survey of Israeli Jews found 23% of them abstain
from some form of treatment or essential medication with income and
family size the main limiting factors. The same survey reported that
56% of Israeli Jews fear they'll be unable to afford needed medication
because of cost, and it estimated that the situation for Israeli Arabs
is far worse.
The situation is most acute in peripheral areas, especially in southern
ACRI
believes that distributive justice demands that the state provide local
health services where they're lacking so all Israelis get equal access
to it. That will require funding boosts not now available or planned.
Worker Rights and the Unemployed
Subcontracted employment is a growing trend in
The
situation is deplorable, organizations like ACRI are addressing it, and
the government tops their target list. It's the country's largest
subcontract employer and the body responsible for making and enforcing
the law. Progress for reforms show promise:
--
in March 2007, the Ministry of Finance's General Accountant, Yaron
Zelekha, directed government ministries to assure that subcontract
bidding includes all social benefits workers are entitled to under
protective labor laws. ACRI called it a "significant breakthrough"
provided they're enforced; earlier efforts failed because they weren't;
-- the same Ministry now requires subcontract companies to present confirmation they're complying with employment laws;
--
in June 2007, the Knesset produced a draft bill requiring organizations
using subcontract labor to assure worker rights aren't violated; and
-- the General Accountant also established a minimum price for employing subcontract workers.
Earlier
in 2005, the government established the "Mehalev" program that was
known as the "Wisconsin Plan" where the idea originated. In principle,
it was sound, but in practice it failed. The idea was this - reduce the
number of guaranteed income recipients by integrating them into the job
market and thus provide better opportunities for more pay and benefits.
In fact, the format was unsuitable for many required to enroll, too
little investment went into the program, and bureaucratic obstacles
overwhelmed its administration.
A
June 2007 inter-ministerial report assessed the plan, concluded it
failed, and recommended a new one be established with a menu of
proposed changes. As a result, revisions were made, and a new program
called "Employment Lights" began in August 2007 with performance under
it yet to be assessed.
The Rights of Israeli Arab Citizens
The Palestinian population (excluding refugees) is around 5.3 million. About 3.9 million live in occupied
ACRI
assesses the damage that shows up in reports and surveys it reviews.
They reveal a disturbing trend - increasing racism toward and
discrimination against
--
the June 2007 Israel Democracy Institute's "Democracy Index" reported
disturbing results explained below, and the data are the highest seen
since pre-Oslo;
--
a March 2007 Center Against Racism report showed a 26% rise in racist
incidents against Israeli Arabs in 2006. In addition, an overall
negative trend toward Arabs is growing, including feelings of
discomfort, fear and hatred. Most disturbing is the government's
attitude and how the media portrays its Arab citizens - stereotypically
negative, threatening and as state enemies. Fear and loathing is then
sown that, in turn, is translated into actions - threats, assaults,
forced separation of Jewish and Arab communities and racist Knesset
legislation;
--
Knesset members (MKs) and public figures want to strengthen the Jewish
character of the state and do it legislatively. For example:
(1)
to make military or national service a prerequisite to vote and get
National insurance benefits; Arabs aren't required to serve in the
military, they're not encouraged to do it, few of them do, and Israel's
Ministry of Defence has discretion under Article 36 of the 1986
National Defence Service Law to exempt all non-Jews;
(2) to require MKs and ministers to declare their allegiance to the State of Israel as a "Jewish and Democratic State;" and
(3)
a 2007 draft bill declaring that Jewish National Fund (JNF) land (about
13% of state lands) should only be for Jews; the bill passed its
"preliminary reading" by 64 to 16. In actuality, the government owns
about 80% of Israeli land, the JNF another 13%, and Jews and Arabs the
rest. The Israel Land Administration (ILA) administers all government
and JNF land, controls who gets access to it, and pretty much assures
that Arabs can't buy Israeli land.
These
and other measures reveal a disturbing pattern - state-sponsored racism
against Israeli Palestinians. They're routinely victimized, punished
for being Arabs, and denied equality, dignity, privacy, freedom of
movement and everything afforded Jews. Their freedom of expression was
also challenged after four Arab documents were published with clearly
stated aims - to legislatively mandate equal citizenship rights for all
Israelis (Jews, Muslims, Christians and others). Outrage was the
response because Jews believe these demands threaten state sovereignty.
So do officials like head of General Security Service (GSS), Yuval
Diskin. He called Israeli Arabs a "strategic threat," and got Attorney
General Menachem Mazuz to agree.
Palestinian
citizens have no say and are disadvantaged in many ways. They're
routinely denied equal access to public resources in all areas of life,
and ACRI highlights the northern rehabilitation program budget as an
example. Arab villages there are sorely lacking because of government
neglect. Budgeted funds are inadequate, they're improperly used, Arabs
in the north are marginalized, their needs go unaddressed, and 2008
promises to be worse with planned budget cuts.
It's
worse still in the south for the Negev Bedouins who comprise half the
area's 160,000 population. They live in villages called "unrecognized"
because their inhabitants had to flee their homes during Israel's War
of Independence, couldn't return when it ended, and are considered
internal refugees and "trespassers" on Jewish land.
These villages were delegitimized by
Existing
communities are circumscribed on a map with blue lines around them.
Areas inside can be developed. Those outside cannot. Great latitude is
shown Jewish communities, so new ones are added. In contrast,
Palestinian areas are severely constricted with no allowed room for
expansion. Their land was reclassified as agricultural meaning no new
construction is allowed. It means entire communities are "unrecognized"
and all homes and buildings there are illegal, even the 95% of them
built before the 1965 law passed. They're subject to demolition and
their inhabitants displaced at
As
a result, no new Palestinian communities are allowed, and existing
"unrecognized villages" are denied essential services like clean
drinking water, electricity, roads, transport, sanitation, education,
healthcare, postal service, telephone connections, refuse removal and
more because under the Planning and Construction Law they're illegal.
The toll on people is devastating:
-- clean water is unavailable almost everywhere unless people have access to well water;
-- the few available health services are inadequate;
-- many homes have no bathrooms, and no permits are allowed to build them;
-- only villages with private generators have electricity that's barely enough for lighting;
-- no village is connected to the main road network,
-- some villages are fenced in prohibiting their residents from access to their traditional lands; and
-- education is limited, achievement levels are low, and dropout rates high.
It's
worse still when home demolitions are ordered. It may stipulate
Palestinians must do it themselves or be fined for contempt of court
and face up to a year in prison. They may also have to cover the cost
when Israelis do it under a system of convoluted justice penalizing
Palestinians twice over for being an Arab in a Jewish state.
In
2007, around 200 Bedouin homes were demolished, compared to much lower
numbers in previous years: 23 in 2002, 63 in 2003, 15 in 2005 and 96 in
2006. Most of the homeless are "invisible," the media hardly covers
them, Jews are largely uninformed, and planned Negev Judaization
assures things will get worse. It's to be a "A Miracle in the Desert"
with a clearly defined aim - to populate the area with a half million
Jews in the next decade. Plans are for 25 new communities and 100,000
homes on cleared Bedouin land. Unless efforts coalesce to stop them,
the human toll will be horrific.
Various
advocacy organizations are trying, and one is the UN Committee on the
Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination. It published its
recommendations in March 2007 that called on
Education in
Sderot borders
In
May 2007, the Court ruled that the government must provide "full
protection" for all classrooms by the start of the 2007-2008 school
year. By mid-October, the
ACRI
also reported on a shortage of educational psychologists to provide
counseling services to students, parents and educators because of the
trauma caused by rocket landings in residential areas. A better
strategy would be for
Migrant Worker Rights
In October 2006,
The
High Court granted another one as well on the way agricultural firms,
nursing care services and other industries "bind" migrant workers to a
single employer. It ruled this infringes on workers rights, must be
discontinued, and gave the government six months to draft new a
employment arrangement for its migrant workers. As of last October,
nothing was implemented, 18 months after the Court ruling. Abuses still
occur, and ACRI concludes that evidence about them paints a "bleak
picture for future employment conditions for Israeli migrant workers."
Then there's the matter of brokers' fees that can be "astronomical" and a way to earn profits at workers' expense.
Citizenship and Residency Status
Sovereign
states are entitled to decide who can immigrate and get permanent
status. But they must consider human rights, issues of family, and not
exclude refugees, asylum-seekers, stateless persons or those coming
under duress.
In
2005, the government appointed Professor Amnon Rubinstein to head a
committee to assess the immigration issue, examine relevant legislation
and regulations, and propose new policies and laws. In February 2006 a
report was issued, but the committee wasn't reappointed, and
bureaucratic guidelines replaced policy with Population Registry civil
servants in charge. An administrative black hole is the result with
policies governing non-Jews stiffened.
Since
2003, the Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law (Temporary Order)
denies legal status to Palestinian spouses of Israeli citizens. Israeli
Arabs suffer the most as they maintain marriage and family ties with
their relatives in the Territories. In May 2006, the High Court
rejected petitions opposing the law and determined that it serves an
essential security purpose. As a result, although the law is temporary,
it's been extended several times, most recently through July 2008.
In addition, the law's scope has been expanded and now prevents family member spouses from
According to the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), the number of asylum-seekers in
For its part,
Even
persons recognized as refugees aren't granted permanent Israeli status.
At best, they get temporary permits for limited stays. Provisions allow
bi-annual renewals if hardship conditions remain in countries of
origin, but at times refugees are summarily turned away and others
(including women and children) imprisoned for extended periods under
very difficult conditions and without having committed an offense.
Human Rights Violations in Occupied
June
2007 was a milestone for Palestinians. It marked 40 years under Israeli
occupation, during which time their democratic rights have been denied
and they've endured appalling human rights abuses - to life, liberty,
security, privacy and personal safety, in or outside their homes. In
addition, they have no property rights or freedom of movement,
employment, or for health care and education. They're collectively
punished and economically strangled. Their borders are blocked and
routinely violated as are their waters and air space. They're also
constricted by oppressive curfews, roadblocks, checkpoints, electric
fences and separation walls, and their homes are being bulldozed and
land taken for illegal settlement expansions. It gets worse.
Israeli
security forces brutally harass, arrest, imprison, torture and
extra-judicially assassinate anyone with impunity. Palestinians are
helpless, redress is denied them, and when they resist, they're called
terrorists. The toll has been horrific, it's too detailed to recount,
so ACRI focused on three prominent issues: movement restrictions,
conditions in
Free
movement is a basic human right that affects other rights: to
employment, to live in dignity, to education, health, and the right to
family life. Since the second Intifada began in September 2000, these
freedoms have been constricted, and it's made life in the Territories
impossible. They mainly affect the West Bank that's restricted by
hundreds of checkpoints, roadblocks, barriers and the Separation Wall
that's taken 10% of Palestinian territory through a shameless land grab
on the pretext of security.
Movement restrictions have split the West Bank into six geographic units - North, Center, South, the
Consider
the checkpoints. They restrict movement and subject Palestinians to
inordinate delays and abusive searches. They're supplemented by
countless obstacles further impinging movement: concrete blocks, earth
mounds, and trenches that deny direct vehicular or pedestrian passage
and allow Israelis exclusive access to 311 kilometers of main West Bank
roads connecting all of
Then
there's the "black lists" called "Police Refused" or "GSS Refused."
Tens of thousands of Palestinians are on them for groundless and
arbitrary reasons with no right of appeal. Their lives are disrupted,
freedom denied and movements restricted inside the Territory or when
attempting to leave. The Separation Wall makes things worse. It's 80%
on Palestinian land, has nothing to do with security, separates
Palestinians from each other, and violates their fundamental human
rights:
-- it separates Palestinian cities, villages, communities and families from each other;
-- cuts off Palestinian farmers from their lands;
-- impedes access to health facilities, educational institutions and other essential services; and it
-- obstructs access to clean water sources and effectively steals them.
The
planned route when completed will be immense - 780 kilometers. By
October last year, 409 kilometers were completed and another 72 km were
being built. As of last May, there are 65 gates but Palestinians can
only pass through 38 of them and only for selected hours of the day and
not at all on some days. Around
When completed, the Wall will create two types of Palestinian enclaves:
-- villages and agricultural land on the Israeli side in what's called the "seam zone;" and
--
villages and land on the Palestinian side that are blocked on three or
more sides by twists in the route or the intersection of the Wall with
physical roadblocks or roads forbidden to Palestinians.
The UN Committee on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination published recommendations concerning
The same situation exists in
Since
For many years,
A combination of restrictions, prohibitions and deliberate harassment devastated
A
senior Israeli defense official explained the scheme that's pretty
common knowledge today. He called it "a permanent process of
dispossessing Arabs to increase Jewish territory." Distinguished
Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe, calls it state-sponsored ethnic
cleansing that's been ongoing since
At
least 1014 Palestinian housing units (41.9% of the total in the area)
were vacated by their occupants. Another 659 apartments (65% of the
total) were as well during the second Intifada. In addition, 1829
Palestinian businesses (76.6% of them all) were lost. Of the total,
1141 (62.4% of the total) closed after the year 2000, 440 or more by
military order. ACRI and B'Tselem believe Palestinian apartment
abandonments were even higher than reported because neighborhoods near
settlements collapsed and housing and living costs declined
dramatically there. Poor families took advantage. Unable to afford more
costly housing, they left distant parts of
Overall,
the affects were devastating - job loss, poor nutrition, rising
poverty, growing family tensions from prolonged confinement, severe
harm to education, welfare and health systems, and a mass exodus away
from areas near settlements resulting in lost homes and businesses. To
this day, nothing has changed, there's no sign it will any time soon,
and things, in fact, got worse.
Israeli
security forces protect settlers who freely attack Palestinians with
impunity. Offenses include physical assaults and beatings (at times
with clubs), stone throwing, and hurling refuse, sand, water, chlorine,
and empty bottles. Settlers freely loot Palestinian shops and commit
acts of vandalism against them and other owner property. Killings also
occur as well as attempts to run over people with vehicles, chop down
fruit trees, poison water wells, break into homes, and pour hot liquids
on Palestinian faces. IDF forces are positioned everywhere in the area.
They witness everything and ignore it.
Soldiers
also commit violence and use excessive force as do police. In addition,
they engage in arbitrary house searches at all hours of the day and
night, seize houses, harass, detain randomly and conduct humiliating
searches and harsh treatment overall. These actions violate
international and Israeli administrative and constitutional law. They
persist nonetheless.
In
Hamas
is isolated, assaulted and called a "hostile entity." Then on September
19, 2007 sanctions were tightened, electricity and fuel was reduced and
so were supplies of food, medicines and other essential items. Tighter
border crossing restrictions were also imposed on an area already
devastated by years of repression.
Its
industrial production is down 90%, and its agricultural output is half
its pre-2007 level. In addition, nearly all construction stopped, and
unemployment and poverty exceed 80%. Shops then ran out of everything
because
Then there's the matter of power without which
The situation may now worsen following
In
addition, an Egyptian oil minister issued "urgent" directives for his
country to provide natural gas to the Territory and help develop
offshore Palestinian gas fields that British Gas Group (BG) estimates
hold 1.3 trillion cubic meters in proved reserves worth nearly $4
billion. For its part,
East Jerusalem is also victimized by neglect and discrimination even though
Israel
refuses and for the past four decades has systematically neglected
Palestinian Arabs as part of a discriminatory policy to drive them from
the city and secure a Jewish majority in it. As a result,
Other examples of abuse and neglect are also common:
--
Palestinians aren't allowed building permits for new construction; in
rare instances when they're allowed, permit fees are too high to be
affordable for nearly everyone;
-- their lands continue to be expropriated for new Jewish neighborhoods and settlements;
-- in contrast, Jewish areas get generous construction and infrastructure investment;
--
desperate Palestinians resort to their own devices, erect homes on
their own land, yet live in fear of frequent demolitions that are
patently illegal;
--
East Jerusalem sanitation facilities are sorely lacking; sewage and
drainage infrastructure is grossly inadequate, antiquated and poorly
maintained; the result is frequent sewer flooding and harmful sanitary
conditions that are exacerbated during bad weather; in addition, trash
goes uncollected and piles up in streets;
--
infrastructure is in disrepair, public parks and recreational
facilities don't exist, the postal service barely functions, and most
Arab neighborhoods get no fresh water;
--
educational facilities are lacking; a severe classroom shortage exists,
and only half of the city's children are enrolled in municipal schools
that are overcrowded, poorly equipped and unsafe;
--
the toll on Palestinians is horrific in many ways: family relationships
are damaged; violence in them is common; school dropouts are high; jobs
are scarce; crime and drug use rises; and health and nutritional
problems are severe; in spite of overwhelming needs, welfare services
are inadequate, near collapse and one consequence is thousands of
children and youths are in acute distress and at high risk;
--
police and security force brutality exacerbates the hardships;
harassment is common and so is unrestrained violence; Palestinians are
terrorized, harmed, frequently killed, and no one outside the
Territories seems to notice or care.
The Right to Privacy
By
law, police must formally request a court order to wiretap. Rarely are
they refused, and in 2007 a Knesset committee investigated the issue.
In November 2007, a new bill was drafted concerning the transfer of
data from communications companies to the police for use in criminal
investigations. It provides wide latitude, and ACRI calls the potential
for privacy violations enormous and possibly unprecedented. Protests
were lodged against the original bill, and they led to important
changes toning down the initial language.
Privacy
issues also affect job applicants and employees, can be abusive, and
individuals get no choice - accept them, or else. They:
-- demand job applicants sign a complete waiver of medical confidentiality;
-- allow employer surveillance of telephone conversations and e-mail correspondence;
-- mandate compulsory polygraphs for applicants and employees; and
-- use video cameras for workplace monitoring.
Criminal Justice
The
right to counsel is essential for anyone charged with a crime. Israel's
Public Defender's Law (1995) stipulates that detainees and defendants
unable to afford help are entitled to state-funded representation, but
only for crimes with prison terms of five or more years. This was
amended in December 2006 to prohibit prison sentences for unrepresented
defendants.
In
June 2007, the Office of the Public Defender published a report on
detention and incarceration conditions in Israeli police internment
facilities. As in previous years, it was alarming and indicated basic
human rights violations, some extreme. An Israeli Bar Association March
2007 report reached the same conclusions:
--
severe overcrowding and highly restrictive living space in two-thirds
of detention facilities examined; some cells were only two square
meters or less;
-- larger cells held up to 10 prisoners;
-- sanitary and hygiene conditions were poor as well as ventilation; some cells lacked windows;
-- wall peeling and crumbling from dampness and mold were common;
-- prisons had filthy and foul-smelling toilets and showers as well as infestations of cockroaches, rats and other vermin;
--
lighting was poor and prisoners often sat in dark, suffocating, fetid
cells; the wings of one prison were described as unsuitable for human
habitation; and
--
complaints were common about violence at the hands of guards and
wardens; collective punishment was also inflicted and overall treatment
was degrading, humiliating and invasive.
Police brutality is a major issue, just as it is in the
PID
was established in 1992 and mandated to investigate complaints against
police in cases of excessive force. However, investigations are rare,
and seldom ever are there prosecutions, regardless of the complaint's
severity and almost never against senior officers with authority. The
lack of effort assures continued brutality because officers know they
can get away with it.
The Destabilization of Democracy
The
Israeli Democracy Institute (IDI) surveyed Israeli citizens, published
its "Democracy Index" in June 2007, and included some disturbing
findings in it. Its survey showed:
-- less than half of respondents believe public speakers have the right to criticize the government;
-- only 54% favor freedom of religion and a bare 50% feel Arabs and Jews should have equal rights;
-- 87% rate Jewish-Arab relations poor or very poor;
-- 78% oppose having Arab parties or ministers join
-- 43% believe Arabs aren't intelligent;
-- 55% feel the government should encourage Arab emigration; and
-- 75% think Arabs favor violence.
Overall,
the results showed democratic values eroding since the IDI 2003 survey.
It doesn't happen in a vacuum. It's part of the cultural environment:
from the home, within families, at school, through the media and other
social contexts from which attitudes develop. It's also gotten from the
law, the way Israeli courts interpret it, particularly the High Court
of Justice, and subsequent legislative efforts to bypass Court rulings
and trample on human rights. The problem is pervasive and worsening as
ACRI cites the role of Daniel Friedman since he became
ACRI
ends its lengthy and disturbing report as follows: History shows that
"parliaments tend to violate human rights in times of crisis. It is
precisely at these moments, however, that (it's vital) to preserve the
judiciary's role in the system of checks and balances."
Stephen Lendman lives in
Obama’s Israel Test: Is the lobby losing its grip?
- Details
- Written by Scott McConnell via Jewish Peace News Scott McConnell via Jewish Peace News
- Published: 03 April 2008 03 April 2008
- Hits: 4434 4434
In analyzing the way the lobby views Obama, McConnell points out two visible cracks in the strength of the "Israel Lobby" :
" the ability to successfully intimidate and the capacity to plausibly threaten a cut-off of campaign funds. Obama ignored requests of Messieurs Dershowitz and Foxman and the world didn’t stop. His internet fund-raising has already generated anxious murmurings. “It’s easier to get credit as a community if there’s a Jewish fundraising event or a bundler who is known to reach out to our community,” one Clinton backer told the Forward. “Online it’s harder.” Especially, one might add, when the new method is wildly outperforming the traditional approach."
Racheli Gai.
http://www.amconmag.com/2008/2008_03_10/article.html
Obama’s Israel Test
Is the lobby losing its grip?
by Scott McConnell
Laying the groundwork for a bold presidential bid, the young Democratic senator set up a meeting with a key leader of the Jewish community. He had won substantial Jewish support in his home state, but as a first termer, he was not yet well known nationally. Sitting down with a prominent Chicago developer, the senator averred that he hoped to make progress on the Palestinian refugee situation.
The rebuke to John F. Kennedy came instantly. Philip Klutznick told him, “If you are going to run for the presidency, and that is what you are going to say, count me out and count a lot of other people out too.” Kennedy counted Klutznick in, shortly thereafter giving a speech lavishly praising Israel and dropping the refugee question for the duration of his campaign.
Once elected, he did broach the issue during a state visit with David Ben-Gurion, and subsequently floated a plan that would allow some Palestinians to return home. The Israeli prime minister was not enthusiastic, calling the Kennedy proposal “a more serious danger to Israel’s existence than all the threats of the Arab dictators and kings.” Leaders in the American Jewish community campaigned vigorously against the initiative, which was quietly dropped. Disappointed in his effort to reach an entente with Egypt’s Nassar, Kennedy offered high-tech Hawk missiles to Israel, beginning the process of turning the United States into Israel’s chief arms supplier and laying the foundation for the present bilateral relationship.
Several wars and many billions of aid dollars later, the politics of Israel-Palestine are not exactly the same as 50 years ago but not that different either. Israel is more powerful and more dependent on American largesse. Americans are far more deeply engaged in the Middle East and for the most part are not happy about it. And American Jews still play a large, perhaps preponderant, role in Democratic Party fundraising.
On the surface, the tie between Barack Obama and Israel’s establishment supporters is warm and comfortable, as it would be for almost any major Democratic candidate. Last year the Illinois senator spoke at AIPAC’s annual conference—“a small group of friends” by his description—and described a recent trip to Israel, his ride in an IDF helicopter, the horror of Hezbollah rockets, the great threat to the United States and Israel posed by Iran. Israel was America’s “strongest ally” in the region. Obama mentioned the peace process, but assured his listeners that he would neither “drag” Israel to the negotiating table nor “dictate” what would be best for the Jewish state’s security. The speech, if not the paean to right-wing Zionism delivered by John Hagee or Dick Cheney, was still well received.
Nonetheless, there is a sense among the Jewish establishment that all is not as it seems—and if the view has not yet crystallized that Obama has a less Israelocentric perception of the Middle East than any major party nominee since Eisenhower, there is foreboding that the times are a-changin’.
That Obama has an Israel issue is not only being stressed by smear artists anonymously circulating emails that the senator is a “secret Muslim.” It’s also a worry percolating at the highest levels of the Jewish establishment. Listen to Malcolm Hoenlein, head of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, at a press conference last month in Jerusalem: “All the talk about change, but without defining what the change should be, is an opening for all kinds of mischief.” It’s not Obama himself, Hoenlein assured. He has plenty of Jewish supporters and advisers. But, he added, “there is legitimate concern about the zeitgeist of the campaign.” Obama, he worried, had criticized Hillary for putting Iran’s Revolutionary Guard on the list of terrorist organizations. Overall support for Israel is broad yet thin, he warned, adding that an increasing number of Americans see the Jewish state as a “dark and militaristic place.”
Israel’s former ambassador to Washington Danny Ayalon added his concern, chastising Obama for failing to clarify how he would ensure Israel’s “Qualitative Military Edge” if elected. Abe Foxman of the Anti Defamation League called on Obama to either change the views of his pastor Jeremiah Wright (anti-Israel, Foxman says with apparent evidence) or leave his church. Thus far Obama has done neither. A confidential memo circulated inside the American Jewish Committee asserted that Obama’s Mideast views “raise questions.” Singled out as worry points were Obama’s call for diplomacy with Tehran and the fact that in 1998 he attended a dinner keynoted by the now deceased Columbia University professor Edward Said, a Palestinian whose prestige has long irritated neoconservatives. (On the Web one can find a photo of Obama, in a black shirt and sports jacket, chatting amiably with the more conventionally business-suited Columbia don.)
These sallies were couched in the always well-modulated language of the Jewish establishment, written by people inclined to persuade Obama, not criticize him. The tried and true Philip Klutznick method. Not so, however, the more polemical wings of the lobby. The neoconservative webzine American Thinker has turned unmasking what it deems Obama’s hostility to Israel into a central editorial focus. Editor Ed Lasky cautions readers not to make too much of Obama’s pro-Israel speeches. “I was there,” he wrote of the AIPAC address, “just a few yards in front of Barack Obama. His speech was desultory ... lacking the spirit and energy that are ... [his] trademark. He clearly seemed to be going through the motions.”
The root of the concern, echoed by The New Republic’s Marty Peretz and others, is that some members of Obama’s foreign-policy team are not full-fledged Israel partisans. Those most frequently cited are former top Carter aide Zbigniew Brzezinski, Samantha Power, and Robert Malley. The latter, who has at most a tangential tie to the campaign, was a member of Bill Clinton’s negotiating team at Camp David in 2000, who later claimed in a much-noted essay in the New York Review of Books that the famous best offer ever given to Yasser Arafat was flawed and was not even a solid offer. Power has become famous as the prize-winning author of a book on the Rwanda genocide and as an advocate of muscular “humanitarian” intervention. Brzezinski, in his late seventies, is still a Washington wise man and one of the few in the Beltway establishment to have come away from the Iraq debacle with an enhanced reputation. He and the Obama campaign say his role is minimal, though that has not stopped Alan
Dershowitz from demanding that Zbig be dropped, counsel that Obama has ignored. Brzezinski draws fire because for three decades he has quietly advocated that the United States take the initiative in outlining its vision of a Palestinian-Israeli settlement, an arrangement more difficult to envision now, after Israel has moved 400,000 settlers into the West Bank, than when he first recommended it.
Malley and Brzezinski really do believe in a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian mess—they aren’t merely, in the manner of the Bush administration, paying lip service to the idea while ignoring Israeli actions that effectively strangle Palestinian statehood in its cradle. Whether Obama would appoint people of like mind to key policy positions or listen to their advice is anyone’s guess. He probably has not thought much about it. Still, it is undeniable that he actually knows people who embrace the Palestinian cause: there is that dinner with Edward Said, and one of his colleagues at the University of Chicago was Rashid Khalidi, the Palestinian scholar now at Columbia. This may be a first for a major party nominee.
These elements alone will probably ensure that if Obama is the nominee, Israel-Palestine will be a topic in the general election. Those already attacking his advisers—Marty Peretz, The American Thinker, the Commentary blog—will raise the volume on their efforts. Obama and his allies will initially try to deflect the blows but will eventually be forced to argue back. Jews who support a two-state-solution—who have long taken a backseat to AIPAC and the neoconservatives—will find their voices amplified through a major presidential campaign. So will Arab-Americans who support Obama. For the first time in a presidential race, the Israel-Palestine issue will consist of something other than two men squabbling over who will more rapidly overrule the State Department and absolutely positively move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
A welcome corollary will be realization that there are different ways for Americans to be “pro-Israel” and push back against the view that being pro-Israel means supporting the right of the Jewish state to lord it over 5 million Palestinians in conditions increasingly seen as resembling South African apartheid. The alternative view won’t sweep the country, but it will migrate from its present home on university campuses and liberal Protestant churches into the wider body politic.
Finally will come recognition that the Israel lobby’s power to dominate the American debate is beginning to weaken. It remains considerable, but two of its pillars are cracked: the ability to successfully intimidate and the capacity to plausibly threaten a cut-off of campaign funds. Obama ignored requests of Messieurs Dershowitz and Foxman and the world didn’t stop. His internet fund-raising has already generated anxious murmurings. “It’s easier to get credit as a community if there’s a Jewish fundraising event or a bundler who is known to reach out to our community,” one Clinton backer told the Forward. “Online it’s harder.” Especially, one might add, when the new method is wildly outperforming the traditional approach. . ?
................................................................
--------
Jewish Peace News editors:
Joel Beinin
Racheli Gai
Rela Mazali
Sarah Anne Minkin
Judith Norman
Lincoln Shlensky
Alistair Welchman
-------
Jewish Peace News blog: http://jewishpeacenews.blogspot.com
-------
Jewish Peace News sends its news clippings only to subscribers. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or manage your subscription, go to www.jewishpeacenews.net
Report Says Israel Slow to Admit Patients from Gaza
- Details
- Written by ISABEL KERSHNERm New York Times ISABEL KERSHNERm New York Times
- Published: 03 April 2008 03 April 2008
- Hits: 4700 4700
JERUSALEM — A new report by the World Health Organization says that 32 Palestinians from Gaza have died in recent months largely because of Israeli restrictions that delayed their access to urgent medical treatment in Israel.
But Israeli officials rejected the findings on Wednesday. They said that the people who had compiled the report had never asked them about the cases, that Israeli officials had no records of entry permits being sought in some of the cases and that details of other cases were inaccurate. Israeli officials also said that the number of Gazans admitted to Israel for advanced medical treatment was increasing.
{josquote}"nonsense, inhumanity and, at the end, tragedies” that “could have and should have been avoided.” {/josquote}
The report, released Tuesday by the W.H.O., the United Nations health authority, and covering October through March, says that in some cases permits to enter Israel had been late, while other applicants had been denied permits on security grounds. In five cases, the reason given for the delay was a lack of available hospital beds.
Most of the report was based on interviews in Gaza with relatives of the dead, and with Palestinian medical workers and other Palestinian officials.
The report points to the turmoil in the Gaza Strip and bureaucratic staff changes there as factors hampering access to urgent health care. But Dr. Ambrogio Manenti, the director of the World Health Organization office for the West Bank and Gaza Strip, focused on the effects of the Israeli border closing in presenting the report and said the cases it described were illustrations of “nonsense, inhumanity and, at the end, tragedies” that “could have and should have been avoided.”
Read more: Report Says Israel Slow to Admit Patients from Gaza
A look back in 2004: A Girl's Chilling Death in Gaza
- Details
- Written by Molly Moore, Washington Post Foreign Service Molly Moore, Washington Post Foreign Service
- Published: 03 April 2008 03 April 2008
- Hits: 2934 2934
Israeli Army Concedes Failure in Initial Probe of Shooting
JERUSALEM -- On the morning of Oct. 5, Iman Hams, a slight girl of 13 wearing a school uniform and toting a backpack crammed with books, wandered past an Israeli military outpost on the Gaza Strip's southern border with Egypt.
The Israeli captain on duty alerted his troops to reports of a suspicious figure about 100 yards from the outpost. Soldiers fired into the air, according to radio transmissions, military court documents and witnesses.
"It's a little girl," a soldier watching from a nearby Israeli observation post cautioned over the military radio. "She's running defensively eastward. . . . A girl of about 10, she's behind the embankment, scared to death."
Four minutes later, Israeli troops opened fire on the girl with machine guns and rifles, the radio transmissions indicated. The captain walked to the spot where the girl "was lying down" and fired two bullets from his M-16 assault rifle into her head, according to an indictment against the officer. He started to walk away, but pivoted, set his rifle on automatic and emptied his magazine into the girl's prone body, the indictment alleged.
"This is Commander," the captain said into the radio when he was finished. "Whoever dares to move in the area, even if it's a 3-year-old -- you have to kill him. Over."
The girl's body was peppered with at least 20 bullets, including seven in her head, said Ali Mousa, a physician who is director of the Rafah hospital where her corpse was examined.
An investigation was undertaken, and the military's top commanders -- including the chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Moshe Yaalon -- said repeatedly that the captain had acted properly under the circumstances. But Israeli newspapers published graphic accounts by soldiers who said they witnessed the incident, and Israel's Channel 2 television aired recordings of the radio transmissions.
As a result, the company commander -- identified by the army only as Capt. R -- was indicted this past week on charges of misuse of a firearm, ordering subordinates to lie about the shooting and violation of military regulations. In addition, the military moved to reexamine the investigation, which Yaalon conceded had been "a grave failure" and which the indictment alleged was the subject of an attempted coverup.
The shooting of the schoolgirl added to a growing number of incidents that have spurred Israeli soldiers to speak out about abuses of Palestinians, despite pressure from superiors in the field and statements by senior military officials playing down such cases. Last week, after troops provided photographic evidence to an Israeli newspaper, the military opened an investigation into allegations that soldiers desecrated the bodies of Palestinians killed during army operations.
In a vitriolic meeting of the Israeli parliament's law committee this month, legislator Zahava Galon of the dovish Yahad party said, "The army sends across a message of disregard for human life" with such behavior.
Five days after the October incident, Yaalon told Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's cabinet that the girl likely had been used as a lure to draw soldiers from the outpost and into the range of Palestinian sniper fire. Yaalon told the cabinet that his investigation showed that the soldiers fired into the air, but when the girl continued walking and tossed her backpack aside, they shot at her, fearful that she might have a bomb.
Under questioning from a cabinet member, Yaalon denied press reports that the commander and other soldiers left the outpost to make sure the girl was dead. At the next cabinet meeting a week later, he went further, saying he believed the captain's account that he was responding to "gunfire aimed at him by firing a burst into the ground" and said the captain offered "a reasonable explanation considering the conditions of the location and the events."
But soldiers who witnessed the incident and told their stories to the Israeli news media eventually forced Yaalon to reverse his claims. Last week, Yaalon conceded that the army's investigation had been a failure, and he said he was "determined to deal with every incident of this type in order to root out every failure of values from the Israel Defense Forces."
"There is no logical reason for what he did," a soldier, who declined to be identified, told the daily newspaper Yedioth Aharonoth a few days after the incident. "Not for shooting the two bullets at her, and certainly not the burst afterward. This is the most sickening thing I have ever seen during my army service. It was desecration of a body. That is not what we are taught to do in the army. . . . The 13-year-old girl was already dead. Why did he fire that burst into her?"
Shmuel Shenfeld, one of the indicted officer's attorneys, said the captain opened fire because of "suspicion of a penetration by a terrorist" near the outpost. He added, "I believe he will be acquitted because he acted the way one has to act in order to neutralize a threat on his soldiers."
Shenfeld denied that the captain pumped bullets into the dead girl, saying he was firing in response to shooting from the direction of the nearby refugee camp.
The indictment issued against the captain alleged that he called several of his subordinate officers and soldiers into his office a week after the incident and "tried to convince" them that they "noticed shooting near the body of the deceased only," rather than shooting at the body. The indictment also accused the captain of asking his men to testify that he hit the body with the burst of fire "by mistake" as he was withdrawing from the area.
Shenfeld said that some soldiers in the unit were trying to frame his client.
The shooting occurred on the edge of the Rafah refugee camp in the far southwestern corner of the Gaza Strip near the Egyptian border -- the most dangerous combat zone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The youngster, Iman Hams, dressed in the striped pinafore worn by girls who attend the U.N.-run schools in Gaza's refugee camps, was on her way to class just before 7 a.m. on a Tuesday morning, her 25-year-old brother, Ihab Hams, said in an interview. Her school is located on the edge of the refugee camp, a few hundred yards from the Rafiakh Jewish settlement to the north and an even shorter distance from an Israeli military border post to the west.
When the school called her family to report that she did not show up for classes and that a girl had been shot nearby, Ihab Hams said he raced to the scene to investigate.
"She was going to school like every day, and the soldiers started to shoot," Hams said he was told by a teacher at the school who witnessed the incident. "She was injured in her leg and became hysterical. She started to run. A teacher tried to stop her, but she didn't listen because she was so scared.
"Then they shot her," he said.
When he returned home, his father asked if Iman, one of nine children, was the girl being reported dead on the radio.
" 'No, she's okay,' " Ihab said his father replied. "I stood at the door and I felt so sad. My father asked me again. Then I told him, 'Iman has passed away.' "
Special correspondent Islam Abdulkarim in Gaza City and researcher Samuel Sockol contributed to this report.
Unpopularity contest: Iran first, Israel second
- Details
- Written by Jewish Telegraph Agency Jewish Telegraph Agency
- Published: 02 April 2008 02 April 2008
- Hits: 4689 4689
Unpopularity contest: Iran first, Israel second
www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/107847.html
JTA
Israel was second only to Iran in a survey of the world's most unpopular nations.
A BBC World Service annual survey of views on various countries found that the highest number of respondents, 54 percent, voiced negative views about Iran's influence on global affairs, with Israel next at 52 percent.
Iran has been criticized greatly for its nuclear program and support of terrorism. Israel, in turn, has been lambasted for its crackdowns on the Palestinians and the 2006 war in Lebanon.
Pakistan was the third most poorly rated country in the poll published Wednesday.
International opinion about the United States appears to have improved, with 35 percent of respondents rating it positively as opposed to 31 percent last year.
The BBC quoted experts as saying the imminent departure of President Bush, whose war on terror has proven unpopular abroad and at home, may have affected views.
According to the survey, negative views on Israel have decreased slightly in Western Europe, South America, Turkey and even the United Arab Emirates. But there has been an increase among Americans with 39 percent, up from 33 percent, leaving them nearly divided on their views at 43 percent positive and 39 percent negative.
The poll of 17,457 respondents in 34 countries was conducted between October and January. No margin of error was given.