Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict slipping away, says British foreign secretary Hague
- Details
- Written by Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem
- Published: 24 May 2013 24 May 2013
- Hits: 4522 4522
British foreign secretary says there is no 'plan B' and warns of consequences of failure of US mission to revive peace process
William Hague visits E1, the site of a proposed Israeli settlement, during a brief trip to Jerusalem and Ramallah. Photograph: Mahmoud illean/Demotix/Corbis
The British foreign secretary, William Hague, has warned of the risks of failure of the US-sponsored mission to revive the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, suggesting that it was the last attempt possible at reaching a two-state solution to the conflict and there was no realistic "plan B".
On the second day of his brief trip to Jerusalem and Ramallah, Hague told reporters that the consequences of failure would be very severe, and the chances of a Palestinian state were slipping away.
The US secretary of state John Kerry's drive to restart talks was "a moment of opportunity that won't easily come round again," Hague said. He later repeated the point: "If this doesn't work, there is not going to be another moment in American diplomacy that is more committed and energetic to bring about negotiations. So it's very important – in weeks, not months – to make the most of this opportunity."
Three times during a 20-minute press conference, Hague said "bold leadership" was required on both sides for Kerry's mission to succeed. Many western diplomats are sceptical about the Israelis' frequently stated commitment to resume talks, given their unwillingness to curb the expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, which are seen as an impediment to peace talks by most of the international community.
Israel cracks down on American travel to West Bank by requiring tourists to obtain military permit
- Details
- Written by Alex Kane Alex Kane
- Published: 23 May 2013 23 May 2013
- Hits: 4944 4944
Israeli authorities have implemented another way to impede free access to the occupied Palestinian territories for American travelers.
Haaretz’s Amira Hass reported over the weekend that Israel is now forbidding “tourists from the United States and other countries to enter the territories under Palestinian Authority control without a military entry permit – but it has not explained the application process to them.”
Hass’s report was published as opposition mounts to the Senate bill that grants Israelis visa-free travel to the U.S. while also codifying Israel's practice of denying U.S. travelers entry on the basis of security concerns. That Senate bill exposes a galling aspect of the "special relationship." All the military aid and diplomatic support to Israel doesn’t shield Americans from being routinely discriminated against based on their political affiliations or ethnic background. And Israel can count on the U.S. not putting up a fight. Having the whole Congress behind you means never having to think twice about these actions.
The policy Hass exposes is yet another example of Israeli authorities’ free reign at border crossings, which includes detaining, interrogating and deporting Americans.
May 19th protest against pro-Israel AIPAC Oregon fundraiser to highlight Israel’s Apartheid Wall.
- Details
- Written by Peter Miller Peter Miller
- Published: 17 May 2013 17 May 2013
- Hits: 5091 5091
For Immediate Release
Portland, Oregon, May 17, 2013. A newly constructed and visually stunning 44 foot long replica of the illegal Israeli Apartheid Wall will be unveiled at a protest outside the annual Oregon fund-raising dinner of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) this Sunday, May 19, 2013. Two JPEG images of sections of the banner are attached. The demonstration will be organized by a coalition of peace, human rights, church and Palestine solidarity organizations which, among others, include Americans United for Palestinian Human Rights (AUPHR), Christ's Way Church, Friends of Sabeel North America ~ Portland Action Group, Jewish Voice for Peace - Portland (JVP), Lutherans for Justice in the Holy Land, and Students United for Palestinian Equal Rights (SUPER).
The protest will take place outside the Mittleman Jewish Community Center, 6651 SW Capitol Highway in Portland, beginning at 4 p.m. on Sunday May 19.
The Israeli Apartheid Wall is twice as tall as the Berlin Wall and over three times as long. It runs straight through the heart of the Palestinian landscape, separating Palestinian villages and cities from one another, and separating farmers from their fields. Because the Wall is such a powerful and ever-present symbol of the oppression of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation, the coalition of groups chose to feature it at this year's AIPAC event. The banner shows actual sections of the Wall, including one of the tall, ominous guard towers. At the base of the Wall is the sad image of Palestinian workers standing in line, waiting to be processed at an Israeli Checkpoint on their way to work in the morning. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this banner is worth a million because it tells the story that AIPAC does not want Oregonians to know. That story, which is what is actually going on, is one of brutal Israeli repression of a largely defenseless population and Israeli denial of the most basic of human rights.
The demonstration will protest AIPAC’s role in promoting a military attack on Iran’s nuclear energy facilities. The protest is also calling for an end to U.S. military aid to the Israeli government, which refuses to halt the construction of illegal settlements and routinely violates the human rights of Palestinians living under Occupation. Israel controls the lives of more than 4 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip but denies them the right to vote or their right to self-determination.
“AIPAC represents a minority, radically right-wing position in its lobbying for the Netanyahu government,” explained William Seaman, a member of Jewish Voice for Peace. “They do not represent Jewish opinion in the United States or in Israel, which is one reason groups like JVP and other Jewish organizations are challenging their disproportionate influence on our political process.” Polls show that AIPAC does not speak for most American Jews.
Demonstrators are committed to nonviolence and oppose all forms of racism, including racism against Jews and Islamophobia. They are asking Oregon residents and political leaders to say No to war on Iran, No to funding Israeli apartheid, and No to AIPAC.
For more information, contact: Peter Miller, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
A satiated people’s advice
- Details
- Written by Ilana Hammerman, Haaretz (translated from the Hebrew by Sol Salbe) Ilana Hammerman, Haaretz (translated from the Hebrew by Sol Salbe)
- Published: 22 April 2013 22 April 2013
- Hits: 4788 4788
The road to hell is truly paved with good, even if sometimes ridiculous,
intentions. A whole line of Israeli writers have signed up to an open letter
to Samer Issawi, the prisoner who has been on a hunger strike for many
months. “We feel,”they wrote to him, “that the suicidal act you are about to
commit will add another facet of tragedy and desperation to the conflict
between the two peoples… don’t pile more despair on the despair already in
existence…. “We urge you to stop your hunger strike and choose life.” And
because they have imposed the responsibility actually upon him, upon the
skeletal bare bones that is still left of him, they, these fully satiated
people, also demanded of him that he should give them hope: ” Give yourself
hope, thus strengthening the hope within all of us,” they write.
And I ask you, my fellow writers and enlightened Israeli people, how did you
turn this narrative upside down? It is not Samer Issawi, but you, who have
given up and chosen doom. You, who have seen with your eyes the moral
decline of Israeli society under its elected leadership. You, who have seen
all this during all those years and either remained on the sideline or
occasionally sounded a whimpered protest – you are the ones who gave up –
you and not him.
Issawi did not choose to commit suicide but to fight for his freedom. Had
you really been anxious about his welfare and wanted to encourage him to
choose life, you would have demanded his immediate release. And it is quite
likely that your voice would have been heard throughout this land and the
whole world. Had you responded in this fashion you would have bestowed hope
upon him and his people – and our people. Because his life and our lives,
his death and ours are all intertwined inseparably. Who knows this better
than you and who can tell it better than you that the decision is in the
hands of Israel and that it is Israel whom you need to address. It is the
government who holds the power and the weapons, not the prisoner who is
fading away in his handcuffs.
Faced with all this power, this prisoner chose the protest weapon of a
hunger strike – a non-violent weapon and one as legitimate as they come. He
has used it for the thousands locked up in Israeli jails for decades and for
the many new detainees who are joining them daily, after having been taken
from their homes during night raids by the army. Well, the level of Issawi’s
anger and suffering meant that he apparently reached the end of his tether,
and if he dies others will take his place – this is his hope and that is his
message, a message of struggle. And you are asking him to drop this fight?
What hope are you offering him, you liberated free people?
You write to him that there are now “new encouraging signs that the
negotiations between the sides will resume which will include the release of
prisoners, including even you.” Really? He wasn’t released all that long ago
following negotiations. He was released back into that big prison that he
and all his people are corralled in between walls and fences a few
kilometres from your own homes. And what happened? He had crossed one such
fence, from one neighbourhood in the city of Jerusalem to another, and was
immediately captured and imprisoned in a smaller jail again. “Do you want
your liberation?” they tell him. “Then go to that jail known as Gaza or to
exile overseas, as long as you go away from your Land, from your birthplace,
and get out of our sight.”
“We are committed to tirelessly striving toward peace between the two
peoples, who will live side by side forever in this country “, you sign off
your open letter to him. You are our greatest writers, who cherish and
respect the meaning of words, how could you lend your name to this kind of
rhetoric today in 2013? After all, if you went to see for yourself in the
place we call “the Territories”, you would have realised that while you were
“tirelessly striving for peace” that big prison, in which one of the two
peoples of the land is incarcerated, has been transformed into a disjointed
region disrupted and divided by huge brown settlements, and there’s no other
place for two peoples living forever side by side…
So here’s what I suggest to you and us in a response to your open letter:
instead of teaching Issawi the rules of struggle, let us learn from him and
join in a non-violent popular struggle. We won’t be fighting for his life
but for our own. We won’t be struggling against him, but against those who
seek to destroy and wreck, who have come from amongst us and who are
now in power.
Let’s carry it in the spirit of what Yossi Sarid wrote here recently. (If
not with a stone, then with what? Haaretz 12 April), he suggested:
“boycotting Israeli goods, not working in the building of settlements… lying
down in front of the bulldozers, attacking the fences and the walls, getting
arrested at every opportunity, filling the prisons.” While it is true that
Sarid actually offered these proposals to the Palestinians (perhaps out of
despair, there is a new fashion developing among good Israelis, to teach the
Palestinians how to get rid of us….) But it would actually be much easier
and more convenient for us to be guided and inspired by those tips.
Palestinians cannot afford to stop working in the settlements nor can they
boycott Israeli goods, for if they were to do that, they will sentence their
families to hunger. They do not have an alternative income or goods. But we
can call for the boycott of the settlements and their products, despite the
law prohibiting it, without risking having food taken out of our mouths.
Palestinians risk their lives when they tackle the walls and fences, and
they are injured and killed while doing so. But we can challenge the walls
in a friendly and peaceful manner: visit the towns and villages of the West
Bank despite the prohibitions inscribed on those daunting red signs that the
Israeli authorities placed on their outskirts. We can transport Palestinians
to visit us. As for lying down in front of bulldozers, we’d skip that for
the time being, for that was the way in which Rachel Corrie was killed some
years back. As for the prisons, the Palestinians fill them anyway from
Megiddo to Nafta, and many spend most of their lives in them. And as for us
– by the time we start filling them because of our non-violent resistance;
by the time A B Yehoshua, Agi Mishol, Amos Oz and Ronit Matalon, for
example, are incarcerated in jail – by then there will be a genuine public
discourse on the direction of our country, and perhaps it will bring with it
the internal change that tens of thousands of us desire so much. I urge you,
signatories to the Issawi letter, brace up this hope inside us.
The author is a translator, editor and author.
A call to reject the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Act
- Details
- Written by flashcat7 flashcat7
- Published: 19 April 2013 19 April 2013
- Hits: 5227 5227
I write this in defense of my Oregon, a state I grew up in and love. I strongly condemn the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013. This AIPAC inspired bill was introduced by California’s Barbara Boxer, and co-sponsored by Ron Wyden. My Oregon is part of a larger world and deserves better than this.
It is often said that there must never be any “daylight” between Israel and the US. I beg to differ. Every time Israel ignores international law, engages in racism, or continues to steal land, we should all feel compelled to cry out for more distance, more “daylight.” The more we become entangled in Israel’s moral quagmire and the more our legislators bend our rules to accommodate Israel, the more likely it becomes that Israel’s oppressive policies will corrode our own laws and values. People must realize that, for all non-Jewish people inside Israel and living under its occupation, Israel is not a true democracy.
Read more: A call to reject the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Act