Americans United for Palestinian Human Rights

  • Home
  • Take Action
    • Ceasefire Tracker - Congressional Supporters of Ceasefire
    • Support Fair Trade
    • Boycott Israeli Products
    • Sign up for Alerts
  • Calendar
    • Submit Calendar Item
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • Historic Documents
    • Poetry
    • Map Card
    • US Campaign's 2024 Congress Scorecard.
  • Links
    • News Sources
    • Criticism & Analysis
    • Palestinian Organizations
    • Israeli Organizations
    • International Organizations
    • U.S. Organizations

New

  • ‘Render it unusable’: Israel’s mission of total urban destruction
  • Witnessing Israel’s ethnic cleansing in the West Bank
  • To my newborn son: I am absent not out of apathy, but conviction
  • Who killed Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh – and why?

Events

In Focus

  • Hall of Shame: Congressional supporters of Genocide
  • CEASEFIRE TRACKER - Track the moral compass of your representatives!
  • National Lawyers Guild requests ICC investigation of war crimes committed in Gaza
  • ICC Preliminary Probe on Palestine Still a Long Ways from War Crimes Trial
  • Why Palestine and Ferguson Are Linked

Key Reads

Sharing the Losses by Gilbert Schramm.

Poems about Palestine. Any profits will go to humanitarian relief in Palestine. On Amazon

Josh Ruebner's New Book:  Israel: Democracy or Apartheid State?

 

Ilan Pappe's Revealing Book:

 
  • Home

UN agency labels Israel ‘apartheid regime’– and Israel likens organization to Nazis

Details
Written by Allison Deger Allison Deger
Published: 16 March 2017 16 March 2017

A United Nations agency today labeled Israel an “apartheid regime,” in a report that found the country guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt” of the “grave charge” of operating systematic discrimination and oppression against the Palestinian people. 

The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) published the document, “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian, People and the Question of Apartheid,”[PDF]. ESCWA is mandated to review Israeli aggressions.  

The findings of the report are non-binding and reflect contributions from professor of political science at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Virginia Tilley and former UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk. It concluded UN organs should sanction Israel and coordinate with civil society groups in boycott campaigns. Apartheid, the report described, is “a crime against humanity” and defined as:

Apartheid, the report described, is “a crime against humanity” and defined as:

“[I]nhuman acts…committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial groups or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.”

While neither Jews or Palestinians are racial groups, the report stated, the apartheid standard was met because ESCWA found a “racial character” to the policies of the Israeli government enacted toward both Jews and Palestinians. This is expressed inside of Israel through separate categories for a citizen’s “nationality” (Jewish or Arab) and in the occupied territories by the absence of citizenship for Palestinians. 

Israel was said to have divided Palestinians into different spheres of governance, each with fewer rights than Jewish-Israelis. Sub-sections of the report outline Palestinians citizens of Israel, West Bank and Gaza residents, Jerusalem residents, and external refugees, all of whom have unequal rights in comparison to Jewish-Israeli citizens. 

“Strategic fragmentation of the Palestinian people is the principal method by which Israel imposes an apartheid regime,” ESCWA said. Individual treatment to each group may not meet the apartheid definition, when taken together the report said, it does. 

The UN body regarded Israel as producing “one comprehensive regime developed for the purpose of ensuring the enduring dominion over non-Jews in all land exclusively under Israeli control in whatever category.”

Read more on Mondoweiss.

Read more: UN agency labels Israel ‘apartheid regime’– and Israel likens organization to Nazis

Jim Crow is alive and well in Israel

Details
Written by Stanley L Cohen Stanley L Cohen
Published: 07 March 2017 07 March 2017

Long before Israel erected separate communities, the United States perfected the art of the artificial divide.


Stanley L Cohen is an attorney and human rights activist who has done extensive work in the Middle East and Africa.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/02/jim-crow-alive-israel-170226083918015.html


For years, Israel has sold, and we in the United States have bought, the cheap peel-away sticker that it is the "lone democracy" in the Middle East.

It has a nice, assuring ring to it, sort of like "opportunity" or "peace", whatever these chants may, in practice, mean. But, like beauty, it remains very much in the eye of the beholder, and like reality, sooner or later the truth surfaces, no matter how well its fiction is packaged.

We in the US are damn good at packaging ourselves, and our charade of equality and justice is second to none. We sell stuff; lots of it. Much of it false. Very much like a willing stepchild, Israel has learned from us that if you say something long enough with vigour, power and money to back it, it begins to take on a surreal life of its own, no matter how much reality puts the lie to its embroidery. Indeed, we are quite accomplished at obfuscation. We know it all too well. We've hidden behind the fog of it for so long that, even today, those who remind us that the earth is, in fact, not flat, remain heretics to be scorned. Have we found the weapons of mass destruction yet?

Long before Israel erected separate communities divided by will of law to segregate its Jewish citizens from its almost two million Palestinian Arab ones, the US perfected the art of artificial divide.

With the accuracy of delusion, from coast to coast, could be heard the refrain that race-based segregation was lawful as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal.

For decades, the legal fiction of "separate but equal" was the mantra that state and local governments, throughout the US, held out to justify the artificial, indeed lawful, separation of tens of millions of Americans on the basis of race and nothing more.

Whether in services, facilities, public accommodations, transportation, medical care, employment, voting booths or in schools, black and white were segregated under the cheap shibboleth that artificial isolation of the races insured equality, as long as the conditions of their separation were legally equal.

These laws came to be known simply as Jim Crow.

Read more: Jim Crow is alive and well in Israel

Israel passes law barring entry for supporters of boycott of Jewish state

Details
Written by AFP in Jerusalem AFP in Jerusalem
Published: 07 March 2017 07 March 2017
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/06/israel-law-barring-entry-supporters-jewish-state-boycott
 

“The knesset [parliament] passed on its second and third readings the entry into Israel bill,” it said in a statement on Monday night.

“A visa will not be granted nor a residence permit of any kind to any person who is not an Israeli citizen or permanent resident if he, or the organisation or body in which he is active, has knowingly issued a public call to boycott the state of Israel or pledged to take part in such a boycott,” the statement said.

Israel has been faced with a boycott movement over its nearly 50-year occupation of the West Bank but it has lately intensified the diplomatic and legal fight against it. 

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement campaigns for a global boycott of Israel until, among other demands, the country withdraws from all occupied Palestinian territories. Israel sees the movement as a strategic threat and accuses it of antisemitism – a claim BDS denies.

Read more: Israel passes law barring entry for supporters of boycott of Jewish state

ACTION NEEDED: Defeat Trump Muslim Ban 2.0

Details
Written by NIAC Action NIAC Action
Published: 06 March 2017 06 March 2017

Donald Trump just reinstated his Muslim ban, signing a new Executive Order that will once again bar nationals of Iran and five other countries from obtaining visas and visiting the U.S.

Trump’s actions are inhumane, unjust and un-American. We will stop him.

Email Congress Today


Nationals of the six countries will be unable to obtain visas for 90 days, but beyond that Iranian visa-seekers will likely be banned from the U.S. indefinitely due to the lack of diplomatic relations and Iran’s designation as a “state sponsor of terror”, according to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

We cannot let that happen.

The administration made some small, completely insufficient adjustments to the ban to try minimize public controversy and avoid being blocked once again in court. They are exempting green card holders and persons who currently hold visas.

The adjustments may reduce some of the chaos at airports. But make no mistake: Iranian visa seekers will be barred from entering the U.S. indefinitely. The Administration has also not provided enough answers regarding non-U.S. dual nationals - the order says they are exempt but their FAQ suggests there may be complications in a dual national obtaining a visa. We are seeking full clarity that non-U.S. Iranian dual nationals will indeed be able to apply for a U.S. visa.

The bottom line is this: NIAC Action, and all of our allies in this battle, are fighting Trump’s new ban on two paths - the legal path and the Congressional path.

Read more: ACTION NEEDED: Defeat Trump Muslim Ban 2.0

Dr. Abuelaish Seeks Israel’s Accountability and Responsibility for Deaths of Daughters and Niece

Details
Written by Washington Report on Middle East Affairs Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
Published: 06 March 2017 06 March 2017

The fight to hold Israel accountable for tragedies inflicted upon Palestinian families will be taken a step further on March 15, 2017, as the Abuelaish Trial for Accountability and Responsibility vs. Israel finally begins in Beer el-Sabe District Court.

Gaza obstetrician Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish’s civil lawsuit seeking an apology and compensation has been pending in Israeli courts since December 2010. On Jan. 16, 2009, during Operation Cast Lead, Israeli shells hit his family home, killing his three daughters and niece.

Israelis heard Dr. Abuelaish’s anguished cries for help as they were broadcast live on Shlomi Eldar’s TV program. Eldar helped get an ambulance to Abuelaish’s home in time to save a fourth daughter who was grievously wounded. The tragedy was rebroadcast around the world and shamed Israel into halting that year’s attacks on Gaza.

After his daughters Bessan (21), Mayar (15) and Aya (13) and niece Noor (17) were killed, Dr. Abuelaish began to seek an apology from the Israeli government for the grief and sorrow inflicted on his family. The Israeli government refused to take responsibility for the girls’ deaths, stating that they were killed in “an operation of war,” and that therefore it would not acknowledge any blame.

Read more: Dr. Abuelaish Seeks Israel’s Accountability and Responsibility for Deaths of Daughters and Niece

More Articles ...

  1. RALLY IN PORTLAND OPPOSING TRUMP-NETANYAHU AGENDAS
  2. A sad sign of the times: Hispanic caucus members ejected from meeting about immigration raids
  3. In First, Israel Mulls Using New Law to Confiscate Palestinian Lands for Illegal Settlement
  4. Solidarity is not selective: Michael Bennett brings the struggle for Palestinian freedom to the NFL
  5. Israel passes bill retroactively legalising Jewish settlements

Page 39 of 105

  • Start
  • Prev
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • Next
  • End
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.