Spanish court to probe 2002 Gaza bombing by Israel
- Details
- Written by Al Goodman, Madrid Bureau Chief, CNN Al Goodman, Madrid Bureau Chief, CNN
- Published: 04 May 2009 04 May 2009
- Hits: 2941 2941
The move comes despite Spanish prosecution efforts to stop the case. Prosecutors submitted documents to the court, arguing that Israeli authorities already have investigated the incident.
But Judge Fernando Andreu, the investigating magistrate who is handling the case at Spain's National Court, disagreed.
Andreu wrote that despite the Israeli investigations, "Israel judicial authorities have not begun any criminal proceeding to determine if the events could lead to some type of penal responsibility," the court order said.
"Evidence of that is that the plaintiffs, victims of this 'preventative attack,' felt obliged to come before Spanish justice to begin a judicial investigation," the court order said.
The case was brought to the Spanish court by Palestinian relatives of some of the deceased. It names former Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and six other Israeli top military commanders and security officials at the time.
Ben-Eliezer last January, after the Spanish court initially accepted the case, lambasted the court, claiming the Spanish law is siding with terrorist organizations.
"This is a ridiculous decision and, even more than ridiculous, it is outrageous," Ben-Eliezer said in late January. "Terror organizations are using the courts in the free world, the methods of democratic countries, to file suit against a country that is operating against terror."
The National Court earlier said it had jurisdiction to investigate the case, arguing that if a potential human-rights crime is not being investigated by the country in question, Spain can proceed, under international law.
But prosecutors then had a chance submit arguments about the case. The judge's order on Monday to proceed despite prosecution opposition is not the first time a human rights case at the Spanish court has gone ahead in such circumstances.
The Israeli case involves the July 22, 2002 bombing in Gaza of the home of a suspected Hamas commander, Salah Shehadeh. The blast killed him and members of a Palestinian family named Mattar. They lived next door. Some of their relatives brought the suit to the Spanish court last August.
Gaza patients questionings 'rise'
- Details
- Written by BBC News BBC News
- Published: 04 May 2009 04 May 2009
- Hits: 2824 2824
The number of Palestinians forced to provide information before being let out of Gaza for medical treatment is rising, an Israeli group has reported.
In the first three months of 2009 more than 400 patients were interrogated, Physicians for Human Rights says.
They say Israeli security services are involved in a systematic attempt to recruit Palestinians as collaborators.
Israeli officials say they are carrying out security checks to ensure those entering Israel do not commit attacks.
Spokesman Mark Regev told the AFP news agency that 13,000 Palestinians are treated in Israel each year.
However, Physicians for Human Rights says Israel also interrogated children, detained patients for undisclosed periods of time, and intimidated them during interrogations.
Those who did not co-operate were refused permission to leave Gaza for treatment, the group says.
Complicates process
Between January 2008 and March 2009 at least 438 patients were summoned for interrogations at Erez Crossing, the main crossing point for people between Israel and Gaza, the group says.
The data collected by the group has been presented to the Geneva-based UN Committee Against Torture.
"The data points to an increase in the ratio of the number of interrogations to the total number of applications submitted to the authorities at Erez Crossing," the organisation says.
The process of referring Palestinians in Gaza for medical treatment in Israel, or further afield, is a complicated one.
It was administered by the Palestinian Authority even after Fatah, the faction led by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, was ousted from Gaza in June 2007.
Earlier this year the World Health Organisation warned that the feud between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority was putting at risk the lives of critically-ill Gazans.
This followed the takeover by Hamas officials of the office that ran the referrals process in Gaza.
Because Israel refuses to deal with Hamas, which it considers a terrorist group, this effectively closed down the referrals process.
Hamas officials have long maintained that the process is inefficient and corrupt.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/8032508.stm
Published: 2009/05/04 13:27:45 GMT
© BBC MMIX
End Palestinian demolitions in Jerusalem, UN tells Israel
- Details
- Written by Rory McCarthy in Jerusalem Rory McCarthy in Jerusalem
- Published: 01 May 2009 01 May 2009
- Hits: 2979 2979
End Palestinian demolitions in Jerusalem, UN tells Israel
Report increases pressure over displaced families but mayor says planning policy even-handed
* Rory McCarthy in Jerusalem
* guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 May 2009 11.25 BST
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/01/israel-palestinian-jerusalem-demolitions
The United Nations has called on Israel to end its programme of demolishing homes in east Jerusalem and tackle a mounting housing crisis for Palestinians in the city.
Dozens of Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem are demolished each year because they do not have planning permits. Critics say the demolitions are part of an effort to extend Israeli control as Jewish settlements continue to expand. The 21-page report from the UN office for the co-ordination of humanitarian affairs is the latest round in an intensifying campaign on the issue.
Although Israel's mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat, has defended the planning policy as even-handed, the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, in March described demolitions as "unhelpful". An internal report for EU diplomats, released earlier and obtained by the Guardian, described them as illegal under international law and said they "fuel bitterness and extremism". Israel occupied east Jerusalem in the 1967 war and later unilaterally annexed it, a move not recognised by the international community.
The UN said that of the 70.5 sq km of east Jerusalem and the West Bank annexed by Israel, only 13% was zoned for Palestinian construction and this was mostly already built up. At the same time 35% had been expropriated for Israeli settlements, even though all settlements on occupied land are illegal under international law.
As a result Palestinians in east Jerusalem had found it increasingly difficult to obtain planning permits and many had built without them, risking fines and eventual demolition, the UN said. As many as 28% of all Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem were built in violation of Israeli planning rules.
"Throughout its occupation, Israel has significantly restricted Palestinian development in east Jerusalem," the UN report said. It said 673 Palestinian structures had been demolished in the east between 2000 and 2008. Last year alone 90 structures were demolished, leaving 400 Palestinians displaced, the highest number of demolitions for four years. Similar demolitions are carried out regularly by the Israeli military across the West Bank.
The UN said it was particularly concerned about areas facing mass demolition, including Bustan in Silwan, just south of the old city, where the threatened destruction of 90 houses would lead to the displacement of 1,000 Palestinians.
Families who lose their homes are faced with the choice of moving into crowded apartments with relatives or renting new homes. They face "significant hardships", including having their property destroyed and struggling with debts from fines and legal fees, the UN said.
A 2007 survey, quoted in the UN report, found that more than half of the displaced families took at least two years to find a new permanent home and often moved several times in the process. Children missed out on school and suffered emotional and behavioural problems for months, with poor academic records over the longer term.
The authorities in Jerusalem challenged the UN report and denied "the accusations and numbers throughout". Israel's Jerusalem municipality accepted there was a "planning crisis" but said it was "not just in eastern Jerusalem but throughout all of Jerusalem that affects Jews, Christians and Muslims alike". It said the mayor would present a new plan for the city.
"Recent events indicate that the Jerusalem municipality will maintain, and possibly accelerate, its policy on house demolition," the UN report said. "Israel should immediately freeze all pending demolition orders and undertake planning that will address the Palestinian housing crisis in east Jerusalem."
Last week, Barkat, who won election five months ago, rejected international criticism of demolitions and planning policy as "misinformation" and "Palestinian spin. There is no politics. It's just maintaining law and order in the city," he said. "The world is basing its evidence on the wrong facts.The world has to learn and I am sure people will change their minds."
Barkat said he wanted to improve the life of all the city's residents, Jewish and Arab, but that he was committed to maintaining a Jewish majority. Jews make up around two-thirds of the city's population.
The UN said nearly a third of east Jerusalem remained unplanned, meaning there could be no construction. Even in planned areas there were problems, including the number of small privately held plots, poor infrastructure and few resources.
Although the number of permit applications more than doubled between 2003 and 2007, the number of permits grants remained relatively flat, the UN said. There was a gap between housing needs and permitted construction of 1,100 housing units a year. "Due to the lack of proper urban planning, the under-investment in public infrastructure and the inequitable allocation of budgetary resources, east Jerusalem is overcrowded and the public services do not meet the needs of the Palestinian population," the report said.
Sour visit: "Increasing indications are that Obama will act to see implementation of a Pal. State"
- Details
- Written by Khaled Amayreh Khaled Amayreh
- Published: 30 April 2009 30 April 2009
- Hits: 3374 3374
Khaled Amayreh
Increasing indications are that Obama will act to see the implementation of a Palestinian state, regardless of the prevarications of Tel Aviv, writes Khaled Amayreh in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem
In his latest visit to Palestine-Israel last week, US Middle East Envoy George Mitchell repeatedly urged the right- wing Israeli government to endorse the two-state solution with the Palestinians, but apparently to no avail. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told Mitchell that Israel didn't wish to "rule over another people", and that Israel was still interested in reaching a peace agreement with the Palestinians. However, the obvious prevarication didn't impress the former US senator who told his hosts resolutely that the Obama administration was committed to the creation of a Palestinian state on territories occupied by Israel in 1967.
Mitchell reportedly went as far as telling his Israeli interlocutors that the creation of a Palestinian state on the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem was a strategic American interest. Unaccustomed to hearing American officials say "No" or even a "half yes" to Israel, Israeli leaders are now at loss as to how to deal with the "crisis" in Washington. Indeed, a fleeting look at the mostly right- wing Israeli media would give the impression that the ultimate threat to Israel's national security just came from across the Atlantic rather from Israel's neighbours.
Indeed, the manifestly rude reception Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman gave Mitchell during their meeting in West Jerusalem last week, which was incompatible with diplomatic tradition, may be interpreted as a defensive reflex by a government -- and a country -- that always took the US for granted and expected successive American administrations to be at Israel's beck and call. Lieberman, arrogantly placing his hands in his pockets, refused to walk with or shake hands with the American envoy following their meeting. The former Moldovan immigrant told Mitchell that "the Americans have their view points and we have ours, and that Israel is a democratic state."
World Bank finds Israel’s water policy hard to swallow
- Details
- Written by Stephen Glain Stephen Glain
- Published: 29 April 2009 29 April 2009
- Hits: 3060 3060
As a former, and by many accounts successful, finance minister, Benjamin Netanyahu presumably knows his way around economics. So when the Israeli prime minister says he will work to provide the Palestinians with economic, if not political, independence, might that not suggest his hard-line government understands that a prosperous Palestine would be an important first step towards a more stable Middle East?
Not according to the World Bank, which last week issued the latest in a series of reports about how the Israeli government is systematically pre-empting the evolution of a viable Palestinian economy. The 154-page “Assessment of Restrictions on Palestinian Water Sector Development” is written with a blandness suited to the banality of this particular Israeli outrage. The report offers a detailed look at how Israel deprives the West Bank and Gaza of the most basic commodity for human survival, a deficit that consumes a growing share of Palestinian GDP.
The report is another indictment, as if one were needed, of the now-defunct Oslo Accords. Just as Oslo lacked adequate mechanisms to enforce Israeli pledges to sharply reduce its occupation of Palestinian land, so too has Israel been allowed to abrogate its commitment to revise interim agreements relating to water systems in the Arab territories it controls.
Instead, according to the World Bank report, Israel has aggrandised a growing share of available water supplies while intensifying Palestinian reliance on Mekorot, the Jewish state’s national water carrier. The report states that Israel, without the approval of the Israeli-Palestinian Joint Water Committee (JWC) – a legacy of the Oslo process – draws more than 50 per cent from the aquifers that support both the West Bank and Israel beyond what it is authorised under the accords. Needless to say, Palestinian protests of such violations are routinely ignored, according to the report.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is as much about resources as it is about land. It is no coincidence, for example, that West Bank settlements are located on top or near groundwater wells, a strategy that dates back to the earliest days of the settler movement. But the situation has worsened over the past decade, when Israel began restricting mobility in the West Bank and Gaza following its “withdrawal” from certain Palestinian areas under the terms of Oslo. Palestinians must now pay an estimated 8 per cent of their household budgets for adequate water supplies, about double the globally accepted standard. That is beyond the capacity of many Palestinian families, and revenues have fallen precipitously in the parts of the West Bank under Palestinian administration.
Rural villagers who are unconnected to the water grid must allocate up to 20 per cent of their household income for tanker-born drinkable water, an increasingly expensive enterprise due to the proliferation of Israel-controlled checkpoints, the massive, serpentine security wall and other barriers to mobility throughout the West Bank. The World Bank estimates the added expense of transporting water by tanker amounts to about 1 per cent of the Palestinian GDP. In Gaza, water availability has reached “crisis levels”, while utility revenues have collapsed and tax collections rates are down 20 per cent.
Water quality is deteriorating and there is growing evidence of rising water-related diseases. The public health costs of waterborne illness for children below the age of five alone is 0.4 per cent of GDP, the report estimates. The environmental impact, meanwhile, is devastating. Sanitation and sewage systems have been badly neglected due to unstable security conditions and Israeli restrictions on movement. Sewage is returned untreated into lagoons, wadis and the sea or seeps into the soil where it ultimately contaminates aquifers. In rural areas, septic tanks are not properly emptied, while Israel’s settler population routinely dumps raw sewage on to Palestinian soil.
Just as Israel controls the borders, roads, air and sea ports, airspace and export revenue on which the Palestinian economy vitally depends, so too does it control Palestinian water resources via Mekorot, an unhealthy reliance intensified by Israeli over-extraction of available supplies. Mekorot’s dominant role in water distribution, the report states, “makes [the West Bank and Gaza] vulnerable to Israeli decisions and interventions, and may increase commercial risks and costs”.
The report concludes with a raft of proposals that might ameliorate the crisis, all of which require Israeli co-operation and consent. It suggests, for example, the wholesale reform of the JWC, which is strongly biased in Israel’s favour due to its disproportionate levels of power and capacity. Only half of the US$121 million (Dh444.4m) worth of Palestinian-proposed projects have been approved since 2001, while all but one mooted by Israel have been granted. Israel, the report lays out, routinely decides unilaterally how regional water sources will or will not be developed.
An economy without access to clean water supplies is by definition unsustainable. Mr Netanyahu either fails to understand this or his commitment to Palestinian economic independence is nothing more than political palaver. Either way, Palestine’s man-made water crisis should be at the top of the agenda when the Israeli leader meets his US counterpart early next month.