Israeli-Arabs fear for their future
- Details
- Written by Rachel Shabi in Umm al-Fahm Rachel Shabi in Umm al-Fahm
- Published: 19 October 2010 19 October 2010
- Hits: 3200 3200
Arab citizens say they feel increasingly unwelcome in Israel and fear forced transfer to a new Palestinian state
Said Abu Shakra Said Abu Shakra: 'The state is saying to us that, as Arabs, we are a danger.' Photograph: Rachel Shabi for the Guardian
Like other Arab citizens of Israel, Leyla Ahmoud is anxious about her future. A young mother of two girls with another on the way, Ahmoud says recent moves by the Israeli government are making it increasingly obvious that the Arabs are not welcome in their own country.
"I feel like my life is not in my hands," said 24-year-old Ahmoud, who lives in Umm al-Fahm, a mountain-ridge town of some 43,000 inhabitants in northern Israel. "The government decides how I live and where I live. We exist in fear, from one day to the next."
Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, famously referred to Arab citizens of Israel, who make up a fifth of the population, as a "demographic bomb" in 2003. His cabinet recently passed a new citizens bill that, if approved, will require all non-Jewish migrants to pledge loyalty to Israel as a "Jewish and democratic state" – although, apparently in response to international pressure, the law may now be amended to apply to all new migrants, including Jews.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) points to a string of other laws in the pipeline that would require individuals from parliamentarians to film crews to swear their allegiance. During the latest round of peace talks, Netanyahu reiterated that the Palestinian Authority should recognise Israel as a Jewish state – again signalling the preference for an ethno-religious Israel rather than a state for all its citizens.
Just weeks ago, Israeli forces staged a training exercise to test the state's response to a potential revolt among its Arab citizens if a peace agreement involved their forced transfer to a new Palestinian state. In a comprehensive security drill, forces practised anti-riot tactics and established two detention centres to accommodate prisoners.
Israel's extreme-right foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has ratcheted up talk of a population exchange with the Palestinian Authority, whereby illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank would become part of Israel while Arab towns such as Umm al-Fahm, in the northern area bordering the West Bank, would be turned over to a new Palestinian state.
Today in Umm al-Fahm, where the loyalty oath is referred to as "Lieberman's law", there is a sense of living inside a paradox. "On the one hand, the state is saying to us that, as Arabs, we are a danger and not welcome here," said Said Abu Shakra, the director of Umm al-Fahm's art gallery. "But on the other hand, we are constantly asked to prove our loyalty to the state."
While supportive of the Palestinian struggle for statehood, this population - which identifies itself as Palestinian-Arab or Palestinian-Israeli - has repeatedly indicated its wish to retain Israeli citizenship. Its struggle is for equality.
"Where else would I go? My life, my children, my future is here," said one 28-year-old mother of two, who did not wish to be named. "I don't have another place, but what can we do to stop it if they [Jewish Israelis] are the strong ones?" Residents of Umm al-Fahm, which is thought to date back to 1265, talk of family roots in the area stretching back hundreds of years.
"We find ourselves thinking about these things now," 50-year-old lawyer Adnan Asad said of a possible population exchange. "I think, if you do transfer us, just do it when the kids are still young so that they might have a change to adapt. We're making jokes about what we'll sell when we become the street traders from the Palestinian state that stand at Israeli junctions."
Recent developments have drawn protest from some Israelis who say they are alarmed by their government's "anti-democratic" and "fascist" legislation. ACRI has asked the prime minister to make clear that there are no transfer plans on the negotiating table, and l ast weekend, thousands demonstrated agaisnt the policies in Tel Aviv. Speaking at the protest, Knesset member Dov Khenin, of the leftwing Arab-Jewish party Hadash, warned: "The population transfer has turned from a nightmare into an operational plan."
In Umm al-Fahm, Israel's second largest Arab town, residents believe the policies aren't just bad for the Arab minority but for the entire Israeli population.
Abu Shakra said he had worked to further dialogue between Jews and Arabs in Israel in Israel for 15 years – but that the government now seemed intent on making this untenable. "They are looking for ways to provoke conflict, not to create dialogue or equality," he said. "After 60 years, it is time they embraced the Arab population and understood that if things are not good for Arabs in Israel, they won't be good for anyone."
Dutch police raided the offices of a company leasing cranes fo building the West Bank Wall
- Details
- Written by Adam Keller, Gush Shalom Spokesperson Adam Keller, Gush Shalom Spokesperson
- Published: 19 October 2010 19 October 2010
- Hits: 2358 2358
Press Release 10/19/2010
Dutch
police raided the offices of a company leasing cranes for building the
West Bank Separation Fence and settlements. Company executives,
including the Israeli Doron Livnat, may face trial for violating
International Law. Dutch government warned the Riwal Company two years
ago not to engage in construction in the Occupied Trritories. Gush
Shalom: another warning sign of the abyss of international isolation
into which the Government of Israel leads us
A few days ago, the Dutch police's National Crime Squad
raided the offices of the Riwal Holding Group in the city of Dordrecht,
confiscating computers documents relating to the leasing of cranes
owned by the the company's Israeli branch for the construction of the
"Separation Wall" and of settlements in the Occupied Territories. Police
findings have been passed on to the Dutch State Prosecution,
which should decide whether or not to prosecute the corporate
executives - including the Israeli businessman Doron Livnat – on charges
of violating International Law.
The affair started with the 2004 ruling by the International Court
in The Hague, which determined that construction of the "Separation
Wall" within the West Bank territory constituted a violation of
International Law, and that if Israel wants to build a border fence to
prevent infiltration into its territory it should have been placed on
the border, i.e. on the Green Line. Accordingly, the
International Court judges called for upon all UN member states and
Geneva Convention signatories not to cooperate with erection of the Wall
and to prevent their citizens from any such cooperation.
In 2006, a Dutch television crew filmed cranes active in
construction of the Separation Fence and of settlements, which bore the
Riwal Company logo. Dutch Labour Party MP's raised the issue and addressed parliamentary questions
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs. As a result, the Dutch Government
in 2008 warned the Riwal company not to engage in activities at the
Occupied Territories. But the organization "United Civilians for Peace"
in Amsterdam found evidence that the company ignored the government
warning and continued this activity.
Last year the Palestinian human rights organization Al Haq of Ramallah engaged the Dutch law firm Bohler. On its behalf, Adv. Liesbeth Zegveld lodged this year a complaint to the legal authorities. The raid on the Riwal Dordrecht offices is a tangible result of this activity.
Gush Shalom, the Israeli Peace Bloc, regards this episode as yet
another alarming sign of Israel's deteriorating international position,
fast slipping down to a disastrous total isolation. "A decade ago,
authorities in the Netherlands would not have considered taking such
measures. The Israeli Government, renewing settlement
construction, promoting loyalty oaths and ever new provocations,
confronts the entire the world, alienates Israel's best friends and
takes us on a mad gallop into the abyss".
Riwal is the largest company in the Netherlands in the field of building cranes, and among the largest in the world. The Riwal Israel Company, active also under the name "Lia Holding", was in the news a few years ago when a business dispute between it and the competing "Avi Cranes" escalated into violence and the setting of cranes on fire.
Contact: Adam Keller, Gush Shalom Spokesperson 03-5565804 or 054-2340749
Background:
http://www.unitedcivilians.nl/documents/docs/UCP_research_Riwal_and_the_Wall.pdf
http://www.khl.com/magazines/access-international/detail/item58754/
http://www.alhaq.org/etemplate.php?id=552
Bafta-winning filmaker Mike Leigh cancels Israel visit over loyalty oath bill
- Details
- Written by Ben Child Ben Child
- Published: 18 October 2010 18 October 2010
- Hits: 3312 3312
Director pulls out of Jerusalem teaching trip in protest against
Israel's proposed loyalty oath for new citizens, saying the
controversial policy was 'the last straw'{josquote}"Eight weeks after our lunch, the Israeli attack on the flotilla took
place. As I watched the world very properly condemn this atrocity, I
almost cancelled. I now wish I had, and blame my cowardice for not
having done so.
"Since then, your government has gone from bad to worse. I need not
itemise all that has taken place ... I still had not faced up to the
prospect of pulling out until a few weeks ago, but the resumption of the
illegal building on the West Bank made me start to consider it
seriously. And now we have the Loyalty Oath.
"This is the last straw – quite apart from the ongoing criminal blockade
of Gaza, not to mention the endless shooting of innocent people there,
including juveniles ..."{/josquote}
Bafta-winning film-maker Mike Leigh has pulled out of a teaching trip to
Israel due to his concern over the country's proposed loyalty oath
bill.
Leigh said he was not prepared to take part in the "great masters"
programme at the Sam Spiegel Film & Television School in Jerusalem.
In a letter to school director Renen Schorr, he cited several of
Israel's policies, including the oath, which would require non-Jews
seeking Israeli citizenship to pledge allegiance to Israel as a "Jewish
and democratic state".
"As you know, I have always had serious misgivings about coming, but I
allowed myself to be persuaded by your sincerity and your commitment,"
Leigh wrote. "And it is because of those special qualities of yours that
I am especially sorry to have to let you down. But I have absolutely no
choice. I cannot come, I do not want to come, and I am not coming.
Read more: Bafta-winning filmaker Mike Leigh cancels Israel visit over loyalty oath bill
AIPAC, AJC, ADL: To Hell With The Turks
- Details
- Written by M.J. Rosenberg M.J. Rosenberg
- Published: 14 October 2010 14 October 2010
- Hits: 3220 3220
For decades, these three have been unabashedly pro-Turkish. If Turkey was for it, they were for it. No matter what the issue -- even one as emotional as the Armenian genocide -- the big three Jewish organizations backed Turkey to the hilt as did their Congressional cutouts. (Not long ago, ADL fired an official in Boston for saying that there was an Armenian genocide).
The reason. Turkey was (and, in my opinion, is) Israel's most powerful friend in the Muslim world. Going back to its first prime minister, David Ben Gurion, Israel worked hard at maintaining a strategic friendship with the Turks.
And so did Israel's lobby in America.
By extension, the lobby did not like Greece, Greek Cyprus, or anything the Greeks liked. The organizations loved sending delegations to Turkey, encouraging Jewish tourism there, and celebrated Turkey as utterly free of anti-semitism. (The Greeks were dismissed as incorrigibly left-wing).
No more. Ever since the Turks opposed the Gaza invasion and blockade, the lobby has been furious at Turks for their temerity. Its prime minister even publicly admonished Shimon Peres about Gaza in Davos. And then there was the flotilla incident (about which Turkey has infinitely more reason to be angry about than Israel), Within the period of a few months, Israel and its lobby turned on Turkey with a vengeance. Even the 1915 genocide that previously wasn't a genocide became one overnight.
Now Turkey is the country the lobby loves to hate. Assuming that the best way to stick it to Turkey is to suck up to Greece, that it what AIPAC, AJC, and ADL are doing. In lockstep. These guys remind me of American communists back in the 1930's, with their sheer dexterity at shifting policies in about an hour! How silly can you get?
Jonathan Broder writes all about it in Congressional Quarterly (I don't have the link because I can't afford a subscription) but here is a small excerpt. It is about the new lobby position on Cyprus, a subject about which it previously showed no interest. But the new anti-Turkish position applies across the board. (The American Jewish Committee should be calling for renaming Istanbul any day now. Why not Constantinople?).
Here's Broder.
Pro-Israel powerhouses such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee, all of which had advocated effectively for Turkey before relations between Jerusalem and Ankara began to fray, were among the organizations that joined forces with several Greek-American groups to lobby for passage of the Cyprus resolution. Bilirakis said Jewish lawmakers and members of the pro-Greece caucus teamed up to get the resolution passed."Greece determined that closer relations with Israel could diminish the strength of the Turkish-American lobby," said Ekavi Athanassopoulou,a political scientist at the University of Athens.
And the word is getting down to the community too. "The Greek Islands are prettier than the Turkish islands. And Greece is Israel's friend."
Hilarious. The islands are all beautiful. But Greece has never been very friendly to Israel, while Turkey always has. Besides, even if it wanted to, Greece cannot offer Israel what Turkey can: a key friend in the Muslim word.
Previous Israeli prime ministers would understand the necessity of maintaining good solid ties with Turkey. After all, they worked for decades to build them. But not Netanyahu and his sidekick, Avigdor Lieberman. Their foreign policy is all about self-pity, resentment, and spite. In this case, they are spiting themselves and hurting Israel.
And their pet lemmings -- the "pro-Israel" lobby that is anything but -- are running off the cliff with them.
For Israel's sake, these people need to grow up. Israel should be friendly with Greece. But it needs to be friendly to Turkey. Is that too hard to grasp?
Israeli soldiers to testify behind screen in Corrie Case
- Details
- Written by The Rachel Corrie Foundation The Rachel Corrie Foundation
- Published: 07 October 2010 07 October 2010
- Hits: 3545 3545
“Today I was struck by the lead investigator’s failures – his failure to look for evidence, to secure evidence, to resolve conflicting evidence, and to turn evidence over to this court,” said Craig Corrie, Rachel’s father. “This is not what we and the U.S. government were promised by the government of Israel when Rachel was killed and it is not what we will accept now.”
Read more: Israeli soldiers to testify behind screen in Corrie Case