The Mega Prison of Palestine

In several articles published by The Electronic Intifada, I claimed that Israel is pursuing a genocidal policy against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, while continuing the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. I asserted that the genocidal policies are a result of a lack of strategy. The argument was that since the Israeli political and military elites do not know how to deal with the Gaza Strip, they opted for a knee-jerk reaction in the form of massive killing of citizens whenever the Palestinians in the Strip dared to protest by force their strangulation and imprisonment. The end result so far is the escalation of the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians — more than one hundred in the first days of March 2008, unfortunately validating the adjective “genocidal” I and others attached to these policies. But it was not yet a strategy.

However, in recent weeks a clearer Israeli strategy towards the Gaza Strip’s future has emerged and it is part of the overall new thinking about the fate of the occupied territories in general. It is in essence, a refinement of the unilateralism adopted by Israel ever since the collapse of the Camp David “peace talks” in the summer of 2000. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, his party Kadima, and his successor Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, delineated very clearly what unilateralism entailed: Israel would annex about 50 percent of the West Bank, not as a homogeneous chunk of it, but as the total space of the settlement blocs, the apartheid roads, the military bases and the “national park reserves” (which are no-go areas for Palestinians). This was more or less implemented in the last eight years. These purely Jewish entities cut the West Bank into 11 small cantons and sub-cantons. They are all separated from each other by this complex colonial Jewish presence. The most important part of this encroachment is the greater Jerusalem wedge that divides the West Bank into two discrete regions with no land connection for the Palestinians.

The wall thus is stretched and reincarnated in various forms all over the West Bank, encircling at times individual villages, neighborhoods or towns. The cartographic picture of this new edifice gives a clue to the new strategy both towards the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The 21st century Jewish state is about to complete the construction of two mega prisons, the largest of their kind in human history.


Read more: The Mega Prison of Palestine

Who cares they’re only Palestinians

If you are an Israeli citizen living in the West bank towns of Samaria and Judea and you beat up a Palestinian, even kill him or her, there’s a 90 percent chance you will get away with it.

The latest Data Sheet (see here ) from Israeli human rights group, Yesh Din, confirms what many have long suspected to be the case – that the system of law enforcement in Israel treats Palestinians in much the same way as black South Africans were treated by that country’s police force when the apartheid regime was in place.

Yesh Din has tracked police 205 investigation files opened in recent years.  81 of these files relate to attacks on Palestinians by Israeli civilians and this includes 2 cases of shooting that led to death, and 9 cases of serious injury.  The remainder deal with incidents where Palestinians were assaulted with sticks, knives, rifle butts, as well as attacks on their houses and vehicles.

Then there are 79 cases of criminal trespass which involve cutting down, uprooting and setting fire to Palestinian crops and stealing olives during the harvest season.  The remainder of the cases involve theft and vandalising agricultural equipment.

Yesh Din reports that of these 205 investigations “police processing and prosecutorial review have concluded in 163 files. Out of those 163, only in 13 (8%) of the cases were indictments filed against defendants. One case file was lost and never investigated, and 149 (91%) investigation files were
closed without filing any indictments against suspects.”

And what reasons are given for the closure of a staggering 91 percent of files - 91 were closed on grounds of “perpetrator unknown” (61%) and 43 cases were closed on grounds of “lack of evidence” (28%).

Read more: Who cares they’re only Palestinians

Free Gaza Update: Israeli Government Recognizes “Humanitarian” Mission to Break the Siege of Gaza

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Israeli Government Recognizes “Humanitarian” Mission to Break the Siege of
Gaza

For more information, please contact:

Greta Berlin, Cyprus
+357 99 081 767
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Angela Godfry-Goldstein, Israel
+972 547 366 393
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

NICOSIA, CYPRUS (18 Aug. 2008) - In a letter today to the Free Gaza Movement,
the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs acknowledged that the group of
international human rights activists attempting to break the siege of Gaza were
“humanitarian,” and stated that the Israeli government “assume[s] that
your intentions are good.”

Greta Berlin, one of the organizers of the Free Gaza Movement stated that,
“Since the Foreign Minister’s office responded to our invitation to join
us, and said that we have good intentions, we now fully expect to reach
Gaza.”

According to recent reports in the Israeli media however, the Israeli military
is preparing to use force to stop the nonviolent campaigners from reaching
Gaza. It’s not clear if the letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
signals a change of policy, or is simply an attempt to open up an official
dialogue between the state of Israel and the Free Gaza Movement regarding the
current blockade.

The Free Gaza Movement is preparing to sail two ships into Gaza carrying 40
human rights workers from 17 different countries. They will also deliver
hearing aids for children who have lost some or all of their hearing due to
Israeli sound bombs and sonic booms.

The ships have been named the SS Free Gaza, and the SS Liberty - in recognition
of the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy ship, carrying 340 that was attacked by Israeli
fighter planes and torpedo boats on 8 June 1967, assassinating 34 American
sailors and wounding 170.

The Free Gaza Movement hopes to draw attention to the devastating consequences
of the Israeli blockade by actively demonstrating the power of non-violent
direct action to change inhumane governmental policies.
###

18 August 2008

Noam Katz
Director, Public Relations Department
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel

Dear Mr. Katz,

The Free Gaza Movement thanks Foreign Minister Livni for your response
regarding our efforts to break the siege of Gaza. We appreciate Israel’s
formal recognition of our human rights mission, as well as its acknowledgement
that our “intentions are good.”

However, several factual errors in your letter need to be addressed. You wrote,
“Your claim that the residents of the Gaza Strip are suffering from hunger is
groundless…” According to the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination
of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), “only 43.5% of basic commercial food import
needs were met during the period between 3 and 30 December 2007.”
Furthermore, in May 2008, several international aid organizations, including
CARE International UK, CAFOD, Christian Aid, Oxfam, and Medecins du Monde UK,
stated that, “the stranglehold on Gaza’s borders has made ... the work of
the UN and other humanitarian agencies ... virtually impossible. Only a trickle
of medicine, food, fuel and other goods is being allowed in. [The Israeli
Blockade of Gaza] has made people highly dependent on food aid, and brought the
health system and basic services such as water and sanitation near to
collapse.”

Although, we appreciate your offer to deliver humanitarian supplies for us,
Israel’s deplorable track record of delivering supplies is, in fact, the very
reason for our mission.

Your offer also slights our human-rights mission, which is to break your siege
of Gaza. We intend to raise international awareness about the open-air prison
called Gaza, where Israel collectively punishes 1.5 million Palestinians. We
want to pressure the international community to review its sanctions policy and
end its support for Israel’s continued occupation. Finally, we want to uphold
Palestine's right to welcome internationals as visitors, human rights
observers, humanitarian aid workers, and journalists.

We would like to, once again, invite Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni to join us on
our historic voyage to end the siege of Gaza, and to see first hand the
devastating effects of Israeli policies on the men, women, and children of the
Gaza Strip.

Sincerely,
Greta Berlin, Ramzi Kysia, Tom Nelson
Free Gaza Movement, Cyprus
+357 99 081 767
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
-----

18 August 2008
The Steering Committee for the Free Gaza Movement, Cyprus

Dear Committee Members:

Your letter to Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni
as published on your website has been brought to our attention. We assume that
your intentions are good but, in fact, the result of your action is that you
are supporting the regime of a terrorist organization in Gaza, an organization
dedicated to non-recognition of the State of Israel and its right to exist; an
organization that sends women and children to commit suicide in order to hurt
others; an organization that has committed dozens of terrorist acts against
Israeli civilians, including massive attacks of rockets and mortar bombs on
Israeli communities in the heart of Israel's sovereign territory.  It is this
organization that does not allow the Israelis and Palestinians to live in
peace. In 2005, Israel withdrew all of its forces and all of its citizens from
the Gaza Strip so that the Palestinians could manage their own lives; in
return, innocent Israeli citizens were the targets of repeated attacks launched
from within Palestinian civilian population centers, turning the Palestinian
population into hostages of the terrorist organizations and the Hamas regime.
The attacks from the Gaza Strip against Israeli communities continue to this
day.

In June 2007, Hamas led a violent coup in Gaza and seized the government
illegally, a fact which led to an international boycott and isolation of its
government. The international community also set clear conditions that Hamas
must fulfill in order to be regarded as a partner for diplomatic contacts and
normal economic relations. Hamas is the central player in the Gaza Strip and
the address to which you should direct your complaints concerning the situation
there. In this protest voyage to Gaza , you seek to remove legitimate pressure
on the Hamas government and to violate the conditions of the international
community; therefore we cannot cooperate with your efforts.

Your claim that the residents of the Gaza Strip are suffering from hunger is
groundless considering the amount of food that passes every day from Israel to
the Gaza Strip. There isn't another conflict in the world in which one side
supplies all the needs of the other side – food, medicines, water, fuel and
electricity. Thousands of Palestinians have crossed into Israel from the Gaza
Strip to receive medical treatment at Israeli hospitals.

We would like to point out that the area to which you are planning to sail is
the subject of an advisory notice that has been published by the Israeli Navy,
which warns all foreign vessels to remain clear of the designated maritime zone
off the coast of Gaza in light of the current security situation.

We have received information that you are planning to bring humanitarian aid to
the Gaza Strip. We would like to bring to your attention that the transfer of
humanitarian aid to Israel is effected, at present, through agreed-upon
channels, and the Israeli authorities will ensure that the shipment reaches its
destination via the land crossing points. We will be happy to assist you in
this endeavor.

If your intentions are good, please choose this way; if you do not intend to
deliver the humanitarian aid via Israel , this proves that your goal is
political and constitutes the legitimization of a terrorist organization.

Sincerely,
Noam Katz
Director, Public Relations Department
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
-----

5 August 2008
Tzipi Livni
Foreign Affairs Minister, Israel

Dear Foreign Minister Livni:
 
On behalf of the Free Gaza Movement, we would like to formally invite you to
join us on our upcoming voyage from Cyprus to the Gaza Strip. We feel that your
presence on this important mission would help alleviate concerns that have been
expressed in the Israeli media about our objectives. More importantly, we
believe that it would be extremely helpful for you to see firsthand the
horrific effects of Israeli policies on the people of the Gaza Strip, as well
as to witness firsthand the effectiveness of non-violent action in bringing
about positive change.

While we disagree with many of the statements and policies you have made as the
Israeli Foreign Minister, we wholeheartedly agree with a portion of something
you wrote two years ago when you said:

“For too long, the Middle East has been governed by zero-sum logic. One
side's loss was seen as the other's gain. This thinking has brought much
suffering to our region” (Tzipi Livni, "The Peace Alternative," Asharq
Alawsat, 18 June 2007).
 
This is absolutely correct. We seek an end to this suffering. We find
ourselves, and you must be feeling this intensely yourself, in truly difficult
times. The one thing that is clear is that violence has not worked for anyone
in this conflict. As a group of avowed non-violent, peace activists, we hope
that you will accept this opportunity, move past the zero-sum logic of your
government’s blockade, and join us on this historic voyage to break the Siege
of Gaza.

Your government's siege on the people of Gaza has been deemed illegal by
numerous human rights organizations, has lead to the death of over 200 patients
in the last year as a result of being denied adequate medical care, and has
caused a man-made humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip. Clearly this is
not the behavior of a civilized government, nor can these policies ever lead to
peace for Israel.

Our voyage may seem to be a quixotic endeavor and therefore easily dismissed,
but as a group of individuals who fervently believe that such moves can be
vitally transforming, and that individuals do indeed each have the power to
change our world for the better, we hope that you will take our offer
seriously. We set sail for Gaza in the next few days. Please join us.
 
Sincerely Yours,
The Steering Committee for the Free Gaza Movement, Cyprus
Tel. +357 99 081 767
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
http://www.FreeGaza.org


Israeli academics, peace activists sign petition against attacking Iran

On August 6 over 100 Israeli academics and peace activists released a statement opposing an Israeli strike against Iran.  "Arguments for such an attack are without any security, political or moral justification," they argue.  While this is a relatively small number, the signatories include some high visibility names and has gotten some international circulation. The Jerusalem Post interviews veteran peace activist Reuven Kaminer, who explains the thinking behind the statement and differentiates the Israeli effort from a similar international statement signed by over 150 Jews (http://www.thestruggle.org/jews_iran_8_15_08.htm).  Prominent individual signers of the international statement include Noam Chomsky, Avi Shlaim, Lea Tsemel, Michael Warschawski, Uri Davis, James Cohen, Université de Paris VIII (France) and Canadian concert pianist Dr. Anton Kuerti. 

Joel Beinin

-----------------

Israeli academics, peace activists sign petition against attacking Iran
BEN SALES Jerusalem Post
Thursday, August 7, 2008

Over 100 academics and peace activists joined forces Wednesday to petition the Israeli government against attacking Iran, claiming that Israel should give more credence to current diplomatic efforts.

The petition states that though its signatories understand the significance of the Iranian threat, they believe that Israel is moving toward an attack on Iran and that 'all the arguments for such an attack are without any security, political or moral justification.'

The petition urges the Israeli government to place greater faith and show more patience in the negotiations that western powers such as the United States and the European Union are undertaking with Iran, and that a military strike would constitute 'an act of adventurism that could endanger our very existence.'

Former provost for overseas students at the Hebrew University Reuven Kaminer, who signed the petition, said that the urgency with which Israel seems to be mobilizing for a strike mandated his speaking out.

'Israel is doing this as a loose cannon,' he said. 'Israel is concerned that Obama will be president and there will not be the conditions for a first-strike policy: that if it has to be done, then it better be done while [US President] George Bush is still around.'

Kaminer feels that the petition is an important addition to the political discourse, because Israelis have a tendency to be hawkish in their thinking about Iran.

'The average Israeli is so antagonistic regarding the Iranian regime that he has a tendency not to think logically,' said Kaminer. 'We don't condone any of the state policies or thinking out of Teheran but we're against the statement that [Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] is a new Hitler. We don't think war is inevitable.'

The main advocate of that antagonism and urgency, according to Kaminer, is Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz, who has spoken publicly of the possibility of an attack on Iran several times.

'There's a strong trend in our country to solve these problems on a military basis, even though there are clearly no military solutions,' Kaminer said.

Mofaz's office refused to comment on the issue.

Instead of a strike, Kaminer would like Israel to look toward the multilateral talks being held with Iran, which many governmental officials have disregarded as ineffective. Kaminer, however, said that diplomatic efforts like this take time and yield far better results than military action.

'These things take time,' he said. 'I don't know how many years it took in North Korea, but the Iranians don't want to be talked down to. Given their official position that they don't want atomic weapons, that creates objective conditions for patient policies that can come out better than any war.'

While Kaminer does not expect pro-attack politicians to pay attention to the petition, he and other signatories have been in touch with members of the Israeli political left and believe that in stating their opinion, they are fulfilling their civic responsibility.

'This is not a worldwide movement,' said Kaminer. 'We feel we're making a rational contribution to an important level of discourse in our country. This is our duty as citizens.'


................................................................
--------
Jewish Peace News editors:
Joel Beinin
Racheli Gai
Rela Mazali
Sarah Anne Minkin
Judith Norman
Lincoln Shlensky
Rebecca Vilkomerson
Alistair Welchman
------------
Jewish Peace News archive and blog: http://jewishpeacenews.blogspot.com
------------
Jewish Peace News sends its news clippings only to subscribers. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or manage your subscription, go to http://www.jewishpeacenews.net

Army’s so-called inquiry into cameraman's killing in Gaza a scandal

15 August 2008

Amnesty International has described as scandalous the Israeli army's account of firing a tank shell that killed Reuters cameraman Fadel Shana as a "sound" decision. The army reached the conclusion as part of a so-called investigation into the killing of the journalist and three other unarmed civilians, including 2 children, on 16 April 2008.

The army’s so-called investigation lacked any semblance of impartiality and Amnesty International called for an independent and impartial investigation into the killing. The organization said that the army's conclusion can only reinforce the culture of impunity that has led to so many reckless and disproportionate killings of children and other unarmed civilians by Israeli forces in Gaza.

Fadel Shana worked for Reuters press agency and was in a car clearly marked as Press. He and his colleague left the car, wearing visible Press flak-jackets and he was killed by an Israeli tank he was filming. The tank fired a shell at Shana, which also hit the civilians, including children, and injured his colleague and others around him.

Shana and two children, Ahmad Farajallah and Ghassan Khaled Abu ‘Ataiwi, were killed by flechettes. Amnesty International has said that that flechette shells, which are notoriously imprecise and filled with up to 5,000 5cm-long steel darts or flechettes that spread over an area as big as a football pitch and are lethal, should never be used in or around populated areas.


Read more: Army’s so-called inquiry into cameraman's killing in Gaza a scandal

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.