Israel destroys East Jerusalem hotel for settlements
- Details
- Written by BBC News BBC News
- Published: 09 January 2011 09 January 2011
- Hits: 2680 2680
Palestinians watch as the Hotel Shepherd is torn down, East Jerusalem (9 Jan 2011) Palestinians accused Israel of trying to "erase" them from the city
Israeli bulldozers have demolished part a hotel in East Jerusalem to make way for 20 new homes for Jewish settlers.
The destruction of the Shepherd Hotel has angered Palestinians, who want East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas said Israel was destroying any chance of returning to peace talks by carrying out the demolition.
Israel says it has a right to build homes in any part of the city.
The Shepherd Hotel was built in the 1930s and was once home to Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who became an ally of Adolf Hitler in WWII.
Its current ownership is disputed - Israel says it belongs to a Jewish-American property developer but Palestinians say it was seized illegally after Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967.
"By doing this, Israel has destroyed all the US efforts and ended any possibility of a return to negotiations," said Nabil Abu Rudeina, a spokesman for Mr Abbas.
'Erase identity'
Attempts by the US to revive peace negotiations stalled last year, after Israel refused to end settlement building on occupied Palestinian land.
"Israel has no right to build in any part of east Jerusalem, or any part of the Palestinian land occupied in 1967," said Mr Abu Rudeina.
The Palestinian governor of Jerusalem, Adnan al-Husseini, said it was the latest in a line of demolitions of historic buildings and accused Israel of "trying to erase any Palestinian identity from the city of Jerusalem".
Continue reading the main story
View of East Jerusalem (photo: Martin Asser)
* Obstacles to peace: Jerusalem
The US had criticised the project as far back as 2009, when building approval was granted.
But Israeli officials said the demolition had been carried out legally and defended its decision.
"This is something that every country does in its own domain without the necessity to give any report to any other government," said the minister for national infrastructure, Uzi Landau.
Nearly half a million Jews live in more than 100 settlements built since Israel's 1967 occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The settlements are considered illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.
Separate and Unequal: Separate and Unequal Israel’s Discriminatory Treatment of Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
- Details
- Written by Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch
- Published: 08 January 2011 08 January 2011
- Hits: 2699 2699
This report shows that Israel operates a two-tier system for the two populations of the West Bank in the large areas where it exercises exclusive control. The report is based on case studies comparing Israel’s starkly different treatment of settlements and next-door Palestinian communities in these areas. It calls on the US and EU member states and on businesses with operations in settlement areas to avoid supporting Israeli settlement policies that are inherently discriminatory and that violate international law.
Jewish Leaders Ask Dow Constantine to Reinstate Anti-Israel Bus Ads
- Details
- Written by AUPHR AUPHR
- Published: 08 January 2011 08 January 2011
- Hits: 2659 2659
At noon today, roughly a dozen Jewish leaders plan to deliver a letter to King County Executive Dow Constantine demanding that he reinstate 12 controversial ads reading "Israeli War Crimes—Your Tax Dollars at Work" onto the side of Metro buses. Constantine withdrew the ads after some claimed they would incite violence.
Howard Gale, a local Jewish research psychologist, says 36 members of Seattle's Jewish community have signed the missive asking Constantine to reconsider his position and allow the ads. "This sets a dangerous precedent that baseless threats and bullying can, in the absence of principled arguments, set public policy," they wrote.
What's notable, Gale says, is that these signatories aren't tied to any one group—they're simply Jews who are uncomfortable with Constantine's decision. "If you're Jewish, there's this misconception that there's a magical, mysterious consensus," he says on the phone today. "In reality, there's a wide range of opinion amongst us. A lot of people don't like the ads. But that's not the point. We feel more threatened by the decision [Constantine's] made than if the ads had run."
The letter and more after the jump.
On December 23, Constantine made the decision to pull the ads—which were paid for by a group called the Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign but had not yet run—after Metro received at least 500 calls and emails, mostly complaining about the ads. (In response, the ACLU of Washington called Constantine's decision to take ad money, not run the ads, and then retroactively change the rules for Metro bus ads "illegal.")
Even though many Jewish organizations, including the Seattle Jewish Federation, decried the ads as Anti-Israeli and lobbied hard to get them removed, Gale says that the ads aren't anti-Israel. Furthermore, he and others feel the message Constantine's sending about free speech (or lack thereof) is more threatening than a bus ad. "It's an affront," says Gale. "This goes beyond a difference of opinion. [Constantine's] reasoning for removing the bus ads is at variance with the actual policy. He talks about violence and disruption [the ads would bring], but we need to know both on a theoretical level what he envisions and on a practical level what will happen. If you put buses out advertising Israeli War Crimes, how is that anti-Israel? Who will be violent?"
Here's the letter the group plans to deliver today to Constantine.
Dear Mr. Constantine,
We are members of the Seattle Jewish community who have joined together to urge you to reconsider your decision to prevent the “Israeli War Crimes — Your Tax Dollars at Work” ads from being placed on Metro buses. Your statement that if the ads run there would be “an unacceptable risk of harm to or disruption of service” has baffled and alarmed us. We don't understand the rationale for your claims of harm and disruption, and we are alarmed by the sudden abrogation of the contract for the ads. This sets a dangerous precedent that baseless threats and bullying can, in the absence of principled arguments, set public policy.
We believe that a public airing of grievances is a requirement for a democracy to function. It leads to people feeling engaged and respected, thereby lowering, not raising, tensions and anger. It is when speech and facts are suppressed that people feel isolated and ignored. In this context your decision concerning the bus ads appears counter-productive to attaining your stated goals.
Your claims that these ads might prove disruptive or costly to King County are particularly ironic in light of our county’s history. It took over 20 years to change the logo of King County from a crown to the face of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., over the repeated objections as to the cost and “disruptions” such a change would entail. We believe that as King County Executive it is your duty to do what is right and principled, not just what avoids “disruptions.”
It is necessary to clarify what the bus ads are not. Since the ads state evidence-based claims (see below) they cannot, in and of themselves, be considered anti-Israeli (anymore than criticism of US policy is anti-American). Indeed, as outlined below, numerous Israeli organizations have made the same claims as regards war crimes. It certainly goes beyond reasonable discourse to label such ads as anything approximating “hate speech.”
The claim of “Israeli War Crimes — Your Tax Dollars at Work” is evidence-based and is therefore far from being inherently inflammatory or inaccurate since:
(1) Every internationally recognized non-governmental human rights organization (Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the UN Human Rights Council) that has investigated the 2008 Israeli assault on Gaza has come to the conclusion that there is abundant evidence of war crimes committed by Israel. So too have all the major Israeli human rights organizations (The Association for Civil Rights in Israel, B'Tselem, Committee Against Torture in Israel, Yesh Din, Rabbis for Human Rights, Physicians for Human Rights - Israel, and others). In fact, the most complete investigation to date (the 452 page September 2009 report from the UN Fact Finding Mission headed by the noted international Justice Richard Goldstone) goes further, stating that “From the facts available to it, the Mission is of the view that some of the actions of the Government of Israel might justify a competent court finding that crimes against humanity have been committed.”
(2) The US provides Israel with F-16 fighter planes, Apache helicopters, tactical missiles, white phosphorus shells, GBU-39 guided bombs, controversial DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosives) shells, and a variety of other armaments at US taxpayer expense. Many of these armaments were used in the commission of war crimes (noted above).
Several organizations in the Seattle area (the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, along with the Seattle/Northwest chapters of the national groups the Anti-Defamation League, Stand With Us, and the American Jewish Committee) have exploited the fears of anti-Semitism and victimization to advance a very narrow agenda that has nothing to do with the safety and protection of the Jewish people and culture, but instead serves only to protect Israeli policies and practices that have denied basic human rights to Palestinians. These organizations do not speak for us, and in fact violate the long-standing Jewish traditions we hold most sacred, traditions that have guided us in our lives and careers: the values of justice and liberation. Labeling the bus ads as “anti-Israel,” “anti-Jewish,” or “hate speech” is an offensive tactic which should never be encouraged, and certainly not supported by echoing those claims or acting upon them.
The bus ads are not about singling out Israel, but rather about taking responsibility for our government enabling Israeli human rights abuses, through the supply of money, arms, and diplomatic cover. Indeed, Amnesty International has called for the international community to “act immediately” at the level of individual states “to suspend all transfers of military equipment, assistance and munitions, as well as those which may be diverted, to Israel, Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups until there is no longer a substantial risk that such equipment will be used for serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law” (AI, July 2009 report).
In 2003, and again in 2005, ads were placed on Metro buses that protested the Iraq war. In the 2005 ads there was a graphic picture of an Iraqi child severely injured by an American cluster bomb. There were people who labeled those bus ads as anti-American, yet Metro ran those ads without incident. If we can question the use of US armaments by Americans, why can we not question the use of US armaments by the Israelis?
Finally, we note that if there are fears that ads addressing Palestinian war crimes, proposed by other organizations, might incite hatred or violence, then you should consider those ads on a case-by-case basis according to long-standing policy. It violates the most basic conditions for free speech to allow one person's speech to suppress another's.
We therefore request that you, as King County Executive, act in a manner consistent with supporting free speech, the legacy of the man King County is named for, and the highest ideals of Jewish culture: allow the bus ads to run, thereby allowing the public to question the human rights abuses committed in our name and with our tax dollars.
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/01/07/jewish-leaders-ask-dow-constantin
West Bank civilian killed in bed during Israeli army raid in Hebron
- Details
- Written by BBC News BBC News
- Published: 07 January 2011 07 January 2011
- Hits: 2535 2535
[The Israeli military claims it was out to "arrest" Hamas supporters released by the Palestinian Authority, which apparently has no authority. How do you "arrest" someone by shooting someone in their bed without even bother to checking who the person is? If they had killed the Hamas member, no doubt they would have been "resisting arrest"]
[PHOTO: Sobheye, widow of Amr Qawasme - 7 1 2011 The scene of the killing of Amr Qawasme]
Israeli troops have shot dead a 67-year-old Palestinian man by mistake in an operation to arrest members of the Islamist militant organisation, Hamas.
The pre-dawn raid happened in Hebron, in the West Bank, a day after six supporters of Hamas had been released from jail by the Palestinian Authority.
The man who died was a neighbour of one of the Hamas men.
Hamas has said it holds the Palestinian Authority and Israel responsible.
Reports from the scene of the shooting said it took place in a bedroom on the building's first floor.
The Reuters news agency has reported that the man, Amr Qawasme, was shot and killed in his bed when soldiers broke into his home before dawn.
His wife, Sobheye, said she heard several shots fired and later saw her husband lying in a pool of blood.
"I was praying when they entered. I do not know how they opened the door. They put their hand to my mouth and a rifle to my head," she told Reuters.
"I was shocked. They did not allow me to talk. I asked them, "What did you do?" They asked me to shut up."
The IDF said in a statement: "A Palestinian man who was present in one of the terrorist's homes was killed. The IDF regrets the outcome of the incident." The army has ordered an investigation.
Reports say Israeli forces carried out a number of raids across the city, rounding up five men.
On Thursday Palestinian Authority President Mahmud Abbas ordered the release of six Hamas prisoners who had been on hunger strike. Five were being held in a Hebron jail, while the sixth was imprisoned in Bethlehem.
The Palestinian Authority exercises limited control over parts of the West Bank. The territory is under overall Israeli security control.
Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967, settling close to 500,000 Jews in more than 100 settlements. There are about 2.5 million Palestinians living in the West Bank.
IDF: Not Credible
- Details
- Written by Gush Shalom Gush Shalom
- Published: 06 January 2011 06 January 2011
- Hits: 2543 2543
For journalists
Around the world,
The credibility of
The IDF spokesman
Has been sinking
For years.
The exercises
Of deceptions
Concerning the death
Of the Bil’in woman
Jawaher Abu-Rahma
Has sent it
To the bottom.
-- GUSH SHALOM
Ad published in Haaretz
January 7, 2011